Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 05:14 In article <45253DEE.896AC21A(a)earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Sure. That's local politics and wonderful to use as smoke and >> mirrors to distract your attention from the real threats. >> >> /BAH > > > Local? I guess you don't keep up with the news. All politics is local. The subject we were talking about is national security. If the Democrats, who are campaigning for office, talk about dirty words in emails when they meet with their voters, they don't have to describe what they are going to do about the national threat. The one running for governor here keeps harping about what our current governor didn't do. However, when asked what would he have done, he leaves the meeting. It's a tactic not to address the issue of the threats to our national security. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 05:16 In article <45253B7B.F1D399F5(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> another possibility is >> the goal is to cede to these extremists > >Are you really that monumentally stupid ? > >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 05:20 In article <45253E01.3F09304C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >> >> >> >> >Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling >> a >> >> >criticism "unacceptable." >> >> >> >> Which criticism was unacceptable? >> > >> >Watch this. >> >> I can't. I'm not going to the library for this one. > >Why do you need to go to the library ? > They have TTYs that can access the web without crashing. And, if they do crash, I can walk away without having to clean the mess up. I no longer have the energy to find lost bits and reorder them. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 6 Oct 2006 05:21 In article <45bbi2dht9aebs9qdn8nop7n9ocridrmlh(a)4ax.com>, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:50 +0100, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: <snip> >>Why do you need to go to the library ? >> >>Graham > > Idiot! For someone that claims to have been in these groups for so >long, I find it had to believe (not) that you are oblivious as to whom >/BAH is. <GRIN> Now think about this aspect again. Include your knowledge of this poster's inability to learn from other posters. /BAH
From: YD on 6 Oct 2006 06:32
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:53:32 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >YD wrote: >> >> Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on >> the internet. >> >> Ever tried to figure what you look like to those outside of your tight >> little circle of cronies? > > > What's wrong? Did your only "friend" blow out his brains to get away >from you? I am 100% disabled, but it doesn't keep me stuck at home. I >can still do some work, some days so I do volunteer work to help other >disabled people in my area. You, on the other hand are always bitter, >and trying to slam anyone who has a clue. You obviously have way too much time on your hands to hang out on usenet. - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail. |