Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 06:55 JoeBloe wrote: > Every legitimate post made to Usenet contains the sender's IP addy Not true. Graham
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 06:56 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c(a)4ax.com... > >> It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous. > >Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think the word >you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible". > No. It was said just fine. Nothing you say carries any credence either. >
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 07:10 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:55:57 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > >> > Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. >> > >> > Is that what you want ? >> >> What alternative do they have? Until the Palestinians and Arabs can accept >> Israel's existence, Israel can not hold off on its defensive posture. >> >> Do you advocate Israel surrender? > >Many Arab nations have sorted this one out. We really do need to bash the >Israeli and Palestinian heads together. --- This from a person who professes not to advocate violence. --- >Whilst Israel continues to get a blank cheque from the USA it's not going to >happen of course. --- Why should it? We like Israel and would like to see a peaceful resolution to the Hatfield and McCoy problem over there but, by the same token, if we abandon her she'll most likely be destroyed. So, instead of your solution, which is throwing her to the wolves, I'd prefer we spend as much time and money as it takes to ,hopefully, eventually find the answer to the riddle and bring the hostilities to an end. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 07:19 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:37:24 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Homer J Simpson wrote: > >> "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote >> >> >> 25% of world production? >> > >> > So you are really assuming our use is going to go to nothing? >> >> The US still produces quite a lot of oil. Add in Canada, Mexico and the Gulf >> and you're close to what you need IF you had halfway fuel efficient cars. > >It would help even more if US diesel fuel was clean enough that modern Japanese and >European diesel cars could run on it. The fuel efficiency of these is very good >indeed. > You're an idiot! Now you claim that we don't know how to make diesel fuel? Your US hate thing has really gotten the best of whatever you may have once been. You are surely no scientist.
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 07:22
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:54:29 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >Homer J Simpson wrote: >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> >> I'm saying that if someone threatens their fundamental freedoms, the >> >> >> British public will defend them. >> >> > >> >> > Hopefully. >> >> > >> >> > I grow less and less sure of this as I watch public debate each day. >> >> >> >> A mistake Hitler made. He read reports of pacifist debates in the UK and >> >> assumed they were a guide to the lack of response to be expected during an >> >> attack on Britain. >> >> >> >> The British Air Force response showed him the error of his ways. >> > >> >The Royal Air Force to be entirely accurate but yes, we were certainly far >> >from unready. In fact Britain's armaments industry had been working hard in >> >the years preceding WW2 to make the planes ( and other stuff ) we knew we >> >were going to need. >> >> --- >> And yet, had we not come to your rescue, you'd be dog meat today. > >A ridiculous idea. We won the Battle of Britain and Germany knew it couldn't >invade without air superiority. > All of Europe would have been toast without us... including you, chump. |