From: John Fields on
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:13:25 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>> I give up--I was wrong. You weren't sincere when you said you examine your
>> assumptions. You don't even admit what assumptions you make, and what
>> political filter you put information through. You're no worse than the
>> other knee-jerk reactionaries on either side of this thread. If you are the
>> future of the political process in this country, we are in real trouble.
>>
>> Just a hint, though...you might want to try having conversations with actual
>> mainstream Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than reading some right-wing
>> claptrap written to justify the US's current bad behavior and applying it to
>> all of Muslim society.
>
>The problem is that the above kind of thought is now being branded as traitorous
>in the USA.

---
Really?

Can you cite some examples or is that just some more of your
Ameriphobia?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on
On 07 Oct 2006 19:29:02 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at>
wrote:

>T Wake wrote:
>
>> Still, it is amazing how well he managed to get rid of the evidence
>> come the invasion. If only he had used that skill for the UN
>> inspectors the war would never have happened.
>
>Yes.
>
>And a slighter tread, in the time of invasion. Attack is Attack, let's
>say it is so, but the actions taken contradict any American thinking.

---
I'm American, and I think the actions taken were justified, so what
do you mean when you say the actions taken contradict any American
thinking?
---

>With cannons on sparrows!

---
With BB guns on sparrows, the sparrows would win.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: Daniel Mandic on
John Fields wrote:

> I'm American, and I think the actions taken were justified, so what
> do you mean when you say the actions taken contradict any American
> thinking?


Your self-confirmatory on reasons, why you release someone, is lying on
save, help, security, goodwill and protection.

The standard defense Army of Irak have the order to defend the Land
against all intruder. With or without Saddam.

Your actions were rude and inappropriate. To overrun people with a
hum,m vehicle crab, even more. Shame on you.... is this save, help,
security, goodwill and protection??????



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
From: joseph2k on
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

> T Wake wrote:
>>
>> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:4525CE02.456E30F6(a)earthlink.net...
>> >T Wake wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather
>> >> foreign
>> >> intelligence.
>> >
>> >
>> > Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about?
>> >
>>
>> Interesting argument.
>>
>> I work in corporate security and often work for governmental
>> organisations, will you please surrender to me all your bank records so I
>> can check what transactions take place. I also want you to record your
>> movements and actions at all times.
>>
>> I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms
>> against this.
>>
>> I await the data.
>
>
> It wouldn't do you any good. I am on a small VA pension that barely
> pays the bills. Anyway, I don't have a bank account.
>
>

I did not expect such ignorance from you. Via your VA pension you have
several bank accounts, though you do not control any of them. And yes,
they can be and are used to track you.

--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  
--Schiller
From: Ken Smith on
In article <VZFVg.68$45.187(a)news.uchicago.edu>,
<mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>In article <eg712e$a4m$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken
>Smith) writes:
[... OBL ...]
>>In fact, it appears he changed his plans before the phone call happened.
>>
>This may be but it is not much of an excuse.

It nicely rebuts the claim that the warning of Pakistan was the reason he
survived. We may be stuck with it simply being a matter of luck.
--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge