From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:35 On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 02:45:09 GMT, "jenalyn" <nospam(a)houston.rr.com> Gave us: ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:efqje7$8ss_003(a)s821.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <45206C37.EA6475DA(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>> >>>> Western Europe wasn't interested in getting much involved in the >>>> anshluss, because it wasn't the target of Nazi expansionism. >>> >>>All of which has zilch to do with this. >> >> Your comment is an example of why history has to repeat itself. >> >> /BAH > >If "history" [in your terms] did not repeat itself, the gene pool would not >be as clean... not that it really is. > Gene pool? Racist twit!
From: Michael A. Terrell on 7 Oct 2006 09:05 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > If the mindset of the religious extremists are not changed and > they become successful in destroying Western civilization, the > problems that _are_ killing people today will no longer exist. > I believe you mentioned those killed in automobile accidents. > Those accidents won't happen because there won't be any autos > on the roads. All the lost medicines and better quality foods will shorten the average lifespan by a decade or two, so what's your point? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 08:05 In article <XdOdnQtNpOi5M7vYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg58oe$8ss_016(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <Va9Vg.19654$Ij.16215(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eg2paa$8qk_011(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> The oddity of this, which I cannot find in past history, is that >>>> the extremists are already doing this to themselves. >>> >>>Oh, the innumeracy. At the rate that they're doing that, it will take at >>>least an order of magnitude longer than all of recorded human history to >>>reach the stated endpoint. In the meantime, how about if we stop giving >>>them reasons to do so? >> >> If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam. > >Sorry, where did that assumption come from? You said to stop giving the extremists reasons; they expect all to convert to Islam for the first step. > >> OK. >> Assume that. Since the factions are already killing each >> other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and >> murdering and destroying all infrastructure? The goal >> is to destroy Western infrastructure. > >Says who? The extremists say so. > >More importantly, whose goal is this? Is this _all_ "they" want to do? Apparently. It does not appear that they've given any thought to consequences of such destruction. In Egypt, the extremists over the past century killed and had goals of being power. When one of their members got into power, all of sudden this member found that the ideals couldn't be implemented in real life. > >> This means bridges, >> roads, computers, any science results and their applications, >> white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants, >> food processing plants, etc. Do I need to think of more to >> list? > >Well, no, but some supporting evidence of this being the "goal" of "them" >would be nice. Afghanistan. All of Bin Laden's pronouncements. Wannabe clerics. Kids go to school and are taught how to kill and maim rather than reading and writing and science. The absence of any protests to this kind of behaviour from the Islamic world. Or doesn't actions in real life count as evidence? /BAH
From: Daniel Mandic on 7 Oct 2006 09:13 T Wake wrote: > This is (IMHO) the oddest thing about the jingoism over the "war on > terror." People keep talking about bombing and invading, yet the list > of countries which would have to be bombed / invaded is ludicrous. Not to forget the uran-munition. Probably used uran, (electric power etc. compouter and so...). Looks like a present...., directly from the nice inhabitants of the attacking Land. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Daniel Mandic on 7 Oct 2006 09:13
JoeBloe wrote: > If anything, all you did was abuse it... like you do Usenet. But would you countersign, that there are also full wankers to find in usenet!? Kind Regards, Daniel Mandic |