Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 7 Oct 2006 16:35 John Larkin wrote: > On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:13:25 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > >> I give up--I was wrong. You weren't sincere when you said you examine your > >> assumptions. You don't even admit what assumptions you make, and what > >> political filter you put information through. You're no worse than the > >> other knee-jerk reactionaries on either side of this thread. If you are the > >> future of the political process in this country, we are in real trouble. > >> > >> Just a hint, though...you might want to try having conversations with actual > >> mainstream Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than reading some right-wing > >> claptrap written to justify the US's current bad behavior and applying it to > >> all of Muslim society. > > > >The problem is that the above kind of thought is now being branded as traitorous > >in the USA. > > Absurd. American newspapers, public forums, political parties, and > public institutions are full of different opinions, vigorously and > publicly stated. A very few people call the opinions of other to be > traitorous, and that's allowed free speech, too. > > You say so much about the USA and you know so little. So why are the Republicans branding criticism as treasonous ? Graham
From: John Larkin on 7 Oct 2006 16:51 On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 21:35:43 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:13:25 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> > >> >> I give up--I was wrong. You weren't sincere when you said you examine your >> >> assumptions. You don't even admit what assumptions you make, and what >> >> political filter you put information through. You're no worse than the >> >> other knee-jerk reactionaries on either side of this thread. If you are the >> >> future of the political process in this country, we are in real trouble. >> >> >> >> Just a hint, though...you might want to try having conversations with actual >> >> mainstream Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than reading some right-wing >> >> claptrap written to justify the US's current bad behavior and applying it to >> >> all of Muslim society. >> > >> >The problem is that the above kind of thought is now being branded as traitorous >> >in the USA. >> >> Absurd. American newspapers, public forums, political parties, and >> public institutions are full of different opinions, vigorously and >> publicly stated. A very few people call the opinions of other to be >> traitorous, and that's allowed free speech, too. >> >> You say so much about the USA and you know so little. > >So why are the Republicans branding criticism as treasonous ? Some Repubs may call some comments treasonous, which is their right to do so. And it's everybody else's right to decide if they make sense or not, which they occasionally do. Why your knickers are so twisted over US politics is a more interesting question. I mostly ignore politics, which is mostly theatre. I do what I can to make the world better in fact (as opposed to wasting energy on theory) and try to make my life, and the lives of the people I care for, better. If you read too many newspapers and watch too much TV news - both culled for the inflammatory - you can get all steamed up and get a heart attack from continuous anger and stress. Turn off the telly and take a walk. John
From: T Wake on 7 Oct 2006 16:54 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:780gi25ruponn590krd8cgvvt9p3catitk(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:13:31 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>It is ok, it was an imaginary elephant. In the real world, imaginary >>things >>cant hurt you. As an aside, I know what imaginary numbers *are* and I >>also >>know there is no way *you* are juggling them. > > I say again. You *know* nothing. You certainly know no such thing > as any of the things which you have said about me. Well, you don't know that. I do know your posts are written as if by an idiot. It is true that you may simply be pretending.
From: T Wake on 7 Oct 2006 16:56 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:1a0gi2909f3ana1bebl8q7e0qabhm2t2vs(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:13:31 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>You are possibly one of the more idiotic people who posts on USENET. I am >>surprised you aren't a regular on sci.physics along with all the other >>semi-literate cranks. Do you have some theories of your own on the mass of >>a >>photon or two-way light speed or any of the other crankbait topics? > > You're an idiot. Original. It is good to see your independant thought is going strong. > It is well known how stupid you are in that group > as well. I am sure it is, although "it is well known" is normally the last defence of the crank who is talking nonsense. I am sure you can cite an example. > I have read there for years and posted there as well. You are an > idiot. What nym do you shift to there? I can think of some suitable ones. >> >>Actually, I probably know the answer to that. > > Again, you do not *know* anything. > >> You don't have any ideas of >>your own. > > Sure. My ideas are practical, however. Yours are closer to that of > the idiot, "Gravity Physics". Really? You have no idea how wrong you can be. You'd have thought you would have learned after such a life of stupidity.
From: T Wake on 7 Oct 2006 16:57
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:eg0gi2dr7va8r9gbikji1cmj6pgalcv2ht(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:16:52 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:jv4fi2dv8pn3rk9ii4b82fh6g89ikgcao2(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:05:23 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> >>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>>news:sludi21v218aau83uue1nhpk001333skb4(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:26:17 +0100, "T Wake" >>>>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>>> >>>>>>Sadly, you are a... >>>>> >>>>> Sadly, you are still no more than an idiot. >>>> >>>>IKYABWAI. >>>> >>>>Even being an idiot I am orders of magnitude above you. >>>> >>> Only on the idiot ranking board. >> >>Yeah, you aren't even very good as an idiot. >> > The higher you are on the board, the more of an idiot you are, > idiot. You are such an idiot you are looking at the board upside down. > That would make YOU the more idiotic. > > Got clue? You need to get out more. |