Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 8 Oct 2006 05:56 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:eg9j8q$if6$1(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <9eWdncK2mZOUcbrYRVnyuw(a)pipex.net>, > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > [...] >>> Democrats don't want to talk about it; if >>> they don't talk about it, they cannot deal with it. >> >>I dont know enough about American political infighting to respond to this. >>However, If, as previously mentioned, the problem has existed for a >>century, >>I suspect all parties are equally guilty of action / inaction. > > The republicans don't seem to be guilty of inaction. With the actions > they have taken, the US is running out of feet though. :-) > [...] >>No amount of extremist bombings can repeal your constitution unless _you_ >>(American people) chose to allow it. Fear of the imaginary external threat >>will cause more damage than some idiots with a bomb. > > It isn't the fear that causes the problem it is cowardice. Courage isn't > the lack of fear. It is carrying on in the face of fear. Even a public > that is afraid of an imaginary threat can refuse to give up its rights. Very true and I agree.
From: jmfbahciv on 8 Oct 2006 05:18 In article <4527EEC5.31FECB0D(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >Who is this they of which you speak? >> >> Islamic extremists. Bin Laden has declared it. Iran has >> declared this goal. Clerics wish to remove all vestiges >> of Western civilzation; this includes no freedom of the press, >> TV and probably all computers (anything with a picture of a human >> being), all women in chattel (this is 50% of the labor force), >> public schools will shut down, private property will no longer >> be allowed, banks will be closed so trade will have to revert >> back to person-to-person bartering. > >This is simply untrue. > >Where did you get this idea ? I am able to think reasonably well. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 8 Oct 2006 05:28 In article <3euci2dd3t4o9t2qm6829q55uknrm3hu62(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:26:29 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity. >> >>Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he >>is going to kill a lot of people. It's the Americans' fault >>that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western >>civilization. > >That's actually true. "American" culture, which is actually world >culture, is the thing they fear will seduce their sons and liberate >their daughters. As it must. I call that Western Civilization, not American culture. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 8 Oct 2006 05:33 In article <5puVg.13906$7I1.7983(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg5eir$8qk_010(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <4526343A.24C8CC03(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> ISTR that Bin Laden's next goal is to kill 3 million people >>> >>>Cite ? >> >> I don't have one since I can't access the web. > >That's a copout. How about any recollection at all of where you saw it, so >others can try to verify? The time was around 2004. It was a site that translates that news issued in Arabian. The essay counted 3,000,000 Arabs who had been killed by the US since 1500s and 3 million Americans would have to die to make things equal. /BAH
From: T Wake on 8 Oct 2006 06:37
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:egafn9$8ss_004(a)s779.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <eg5ts4$70s$15(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>In article <eg58fu$8ss_015(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>In article <ZQ8Vg.19638$Ij.7364(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > <snip> > >>>>>> People start to lose perspective on what >>>>>>is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic. >>>>> >>>>> People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush >>>>> is always wrong and is the cause of all ills which is the >>>>> only thing you hear from his political opposition. >>>> >>>>I don't. I evaluate critically. >>>> >>>> >>>>> This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these >>>>> same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat >>>>> to the nation. >>>> >>>>Why do you assume that they "do not intend to deal with the threat"? >>> >>>They say so. Whenever asked for specifics, the Democrat leadership >>>replies with, "Trust me." >> >>Anything is better than "stay the course." > > So you are saying that conceding to the Islamic terrorists is > better? Are there only two options? |