Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 8 Oct 2006 10:22 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >Critically, the threat of Islamic extremists destroying Western civilisation > >is farcical. How could they do it? > > It's very easy. I have a couple scenarios that can make an > irrecoverable mess or a middle mess that would take a couple > hundred years to clean up. I am not going to be specific > here. I'm not as clever as other people are. If I can think > of a couple, there has to be lots of opportunities. You ideas are absurd. Graham
From: Daniel Mandic on 8 Oct 2006 10:46 T Wake wrote: > I simply pointed out there is an error in assuming all the posts made > on websites by Jihadists represent a genuine mindset. Not to forget the arabic (aramaeic) number system, fitting well to the electric phenomens, as we have minus and plus counting. I would not underestimate the arabic things. I am more the indianer enthusiast. I like the outcomings of california and they are known for good stable digital machines (i440BX, as for me). With scientists, living in Tree-houses, inmidst a californian wood. Snappy fruits, fine vegetables and a nice climatology. Well, :-) just wait another 300 Hundred years and they will get more and more Red. Kind regards, Daniel Mandic P.S.: Although, the south-indian cultures with their twenty-numbering system was the most forward culture ever been. E.g. their sun-calculations, using/building whole stone-structures, just to show astronomical beings. North-Indian do also have great wisdom, but deeper. In the South "they" are maybe more intelligent, IMHO.
From: Daniel Mandic on 8 Oct 2006 11:02 Eeyore wrote: > You ideas are absurd. > > Graham He talks about the opposite. Often found when ppl babble.... after some time it (the soul, IMO) talks only about him/her(she very seldom, due to stronger brain) -self. Best regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Michael A. Terrell on 8 Oct 2006 11:31 Daniel Mandic wrote: > > Eeyore wrote: > > > I dealt with the local bully by kicking the front wheel of his > > bicycle from under him He squealed. I needed no electronics to do > > that. > > > > Graham > > I was (have been) the local Bully and good toys I had too ;) (Thank's > Mum....) > > Best Regards, > > Daniel Mandic Sounds like Eeyore was the bully, as well, and not smart enough to use electronics to accomplish his goals. He's always talking about how violent the US is, yet he pulls a stunt like that. No wonder I have him kill filed. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Michael A. Terrell on 8 Oct 2006 11:37
John Fields wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:46:58 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > > >"joseph2k" <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > >news:ceXVg.3010$NE6.540(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > > >> I find that assessment odd in light of the ability of passenger planes to > >> damage buildings like the World Trade Center towers impacts demonstrated. > >> Equally to the point, when told to change course by any military, the > >> refusal does not demonstrate reasonable judgment. > > > >False analogy and lack of critical thinking has hindered your response. > > > >A warship is capable of manoeuvre which a building isn't. > > --- > Not when an aircraft poses a threat, perceived or real. That is, > for all intents and purposes, a ship might as well be dead in the > water when threatened by an aircraft. > --- > > >A warship which is threatened by a civilian airliner in a commercial air > >lane can move away. I wasn't aware the WTC buildings had wheels. > > > >Still, the "might is right" response is enlightening. > > --- > Closer to "An ounce of prevention"... I'd think. He would know that if he had an ounce of brains. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |