Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 16:52 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:9ui2j2hkgshmb1f67m74c47rml78mv9qrl(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:29:22 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Other >>than that, _you_ have done nothing but shown yourself up as a blowhard who >>has heard a few phrases and thinks he knows what they mean. > > > Again, you know nothing about what I do or do not know, nor where I > gained my contact with any such knowledge. Really? As I said before (MSGID news:qtednfHevZ342qzYRVnygA(a)pipex.net), the evidence is in your posts. You claim to know things but the reality is you are clueless. You may really know the ins and outs (what is the attack delay time of a MAS-Hamilton by the way?) of the topics you allude to, but if so you hide it well on USENET. As to where you gained your contact with such knowledge, all I can assume is if it was "real" (i.e. not in a novel) then it was over fifteen years ago. Either that or the person you were sucking up to lied to you. Your posts are riddled with errors, logical inconsistencies and barefaced nonsense. You have even ended up agreeing with me, while shouting "wrong." What do you think this says about you?
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 16:52 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:c3j2j29uktupj2bc1o1t6ff80qispdolui(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:34:38 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:0jg2j2ls52jdfld7u8kk3r2pdveg54cqkn(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:08:59 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: >>> >>>> We really should stop behaving in such a >>>>way that makes other countries forget the good that we do. >>>> >>> You have been listening to too much of the bullshit flying around >>> the world. >> >>You havent been listening to enough from outside your borders to make >>comments about world opinion. >> > Not your call, dipshit. Yes it is.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 16:53 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:47:11 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >It wasn't me who asked for the proof. I don't care enough about you to >bother. Try to keep up with the debate you are in, not the one going on in >your head. Then why did you interlope into the discourse, jackass? You are the one lagging.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 16:56 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:4ij2j2ptgk8n4r5m853hokb9894gb1ov5n(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:47:11 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>It wasn't me who asked for the proof. I don't care enough about you to >>bother. Try to keep up with the debate you are in, not the one going on in >>your head. > > Then why did you interlope into the discourse, jackass? This is USENET - it is an open discourse. > You are the one lagging. The only way you would get that opinion is if I had lapped you.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 16:58
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:49:18 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> Sorry, but I can only disclose that in person, and then I would have >> to terminate your pathetic existence. > >See not only are you lying, but you are deluded enough to think you would be >capable. > Trust me, you would be easy to make a non-user of oxygen. The only oxygen you would then consume is that required to make for decay of your stinking flesh. |