Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 17:00 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:9oj2j2hd9ngt0g8bfs6f13j9il603irgct(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:49:18 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>> Sorry, but I can only disclose that in person, and then I would have >>> to terminate your pathetic existence. >> >>See not only are you lying, but you are deluded enough to think you would >>be >>capable. >> > > Trust me, you would be easy to make a non-user of oxygen. Trust me, you would not be able to achieve this. You can talk as hard as you like on USENET, but the reality is very different. I doubt you are even capable of leaving your own state, let alone doing anything to harm me in a different country. You are all bluster. Pretty sad really. > The only > oxygen you would then consume is that required to make for decay of > your stinking flesh. Only in your fantasies.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:01 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:52:40 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >all I can assume is >if it was "real" (i.e. not in a novel) then it was over fifteen years ago. That's your problem. You assume too much. COMSEC is quite current, dumbfuck.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 17:07 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:vuj2j29au7cs602c3rbsrufpc5bm8c0lj6(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:52:40 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>all I can assume is >>if it was "real" (i.e. not in a novel) then it was over fifteen years ago. > > > That's your problem. You assume too much. COMSEC is quite current, > dumbfuck. You don't understand what COMSEC is. You don't understand how it fits into the security picture. It is "current" in some circles but, trust me, it is depreciated. Check this out for example: http://www.ams.mod.uk/ams/content/topics/pages/2612.htm Which term does it use more? There is one reference document which uses COMSEC extensively but when you read it you will see that it is now used to describe a specific area under broader headings. Have you found out what organisation provides COMSEC advice to the British Government yet?
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:18 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:56:03 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >This is USENET - it is an open discourse. He said... right after he posted "I don't care enough about you to bother..." Which is it, T Weak? I don't care about you... AT ALL! See how that works?
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 17:20
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:fvk2j2tcv9hg3ijf03nkh9u72f5kqf31uv(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:56:03 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>This is USENET - it is an open discourse. > > > He said... right after he posted "I don't care enough about you to > bother..." Your comprehension issue remains. Cutting out the context does not support your claims. I said I didnt care about you enough to bother searching for your examples. > Which is it, T Weak? > > I don't care about you... AT ALL! See how that works? Obviously you don't. You can type it in any case you want. What is your point? |