Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:21 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:00:23 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> The only >> oxygen you would then consume is that required to make for decay of >> your stinking flesh. > >Only in your fantasies. Now I suppose that you would claim that your flesh would not decay... ala Mother Theresa? Sure, bub... you are a real saint... NOT!
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 17:23 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:e4l2j2hioaa1eede4ip76ailr9r3ne6oov(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:00:23 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>> The only >>> oxygen you would then consume is that required to make for decay of >>> your stinking flesh. >> >>Only in your fantasies. > > > Now I suppose that you would claim that your flesh would not > decay... No, simply that the full event you described (not the edited bit above) would only take place in your fantasies. > ala Mother Theresa? Do you think her flesh has not decayed? > Sure, bub... you are a real saint... NOT! Sorry, did I claim to be?
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:25 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:07:34 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >You don't understand what COMSEC is. You don't understand how it fits into >the security picture. It is "current" in some circles but, trust me, it is >depreciated. You're an idiot. Also, the word you may have been attempting to use is deprecated, not depreciated. Still, either choice is incorrect as neither fits the reality.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:27 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:07:34 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >Have you found out what organisation provides COMSEC advice to the British >Government yet? You're an idiot. You stated in an earlier post that it is not hardware related then point to a post which speaks about TEMPEST, and you have no clue as to the fact that that is 100% hardware related!
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 17:28
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:20:22 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:fvk2j2tcv9hg3ijf03nkh9u72f5kqf31uv(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:56:03 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>>This is USENET - it is an open discourse. >> >> >> He said... right after he posted "I don't care enough about you to >> bother..." > >Your comprehension issue remains. Cutting out the context does not support >your claims. > >I said I didnt care about you enough to bother searching for your examples. > >> Which is it, T Weak? >> >> I don't care about you... AT ALL! See how that works? > >Obviously you don't. You can type it in any case you want. What is your >point? > Seems like you are the one that has an obsession with case. |