From: lucasea on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:td03j2truivot3b1ihjrqae8uo85991ebb(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:21:49 +0200, "Frank Bemelman"
> <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> Gave us:
>
>>Sure, simple casualties. Imagine piling them up in your back yard, 650.000
>>bodies.
>
> The number is off,

Wrong. Strike one.


> and so was the claim as to the way they died

Wrong. Strike two.


> as well as the reason.

Wrong. Strike three, yer stupid.

Eric Lucas


From: lucasea on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:mq03j2pn3kl8hcrv8vagv1pmd1bunvrd07(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:44:02 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us:
>
>>
>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>news:gng2j25g6c3qm53pnl00un48fjdi4tkbrt(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:23:35 -0700, John Larkin
>>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:09:07 +0100, "T Wake"
>>>><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>2 is still not a precise number. To this day we can not say it is
>>>>>exactly
>>>>>2
>>>>>with an infinite amount of zeros after the decimal place.
>>>>
>>>>Out of context, that constitutes a collectable quotation! Actually, it
>>>>ain't bad in context.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're right. That remark is anti-profound! Quite collectable!
>>
>>Have you *ever* had an opinion that didn't just parrot what someone else
>>says?
>>
>
> Show me where anyone stated "anti-profound", you retarded twit!

Oh, aren't you a clever little tyke. You added new words to someone else's
opinion. Go tell your mommy, she might give you a gold star!

Eric Lucas


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:oku2j21apc2fpngcr6aq6i895qjnitl0fn(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:35:27 +0100, "T Wake"
> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>>
>>COMSEC is not _limited_ to hardware.
>
>
> Idiot! You just declared in another post that it was not about
> hardware in any way. Get your guesses straight, dipshit.

No I didn't. Learn to read.


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fqu2j25dvsb2tsmif3di90dfeu8a0ks04e(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:35:55 +0100, "T Wake"
> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>>Wow. You really do exist in a dream world.
>>
> I'll take that as a no that you know nothing about her demise or
> what followed.

Well, I never met her so I only know what was reported in the news. I am not
a Catholic so I do not refer to her as the Blessed Teresa. I do not ascribe
the curing of a tumour on an Indian woman to her.

So, probably, no I don't know what _you_ are talking about.

Are you going to imply so holy act took place which meant her body was free
of the ravages of decay or something?


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:bi03j2lj94ttl5jaqgrlahv5o0boofth9t(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:32:38 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us:
>
>>Perhaps because the ones the Iraqis had didn't make a single mention of
>>Creationism...erm, Intelligent Design... and therefore didn't live up to
>>US
>>standards....
>
>
> You're an idiot. You don't even know what types of books were
> included, and I'd bet that none of them have been published recently
> enough to include your baby bullshit claims.

You are an idiot. You don't know what books were included. You don't even
know where the books were handed out. If a load of soldiers pulled up in
some hick US town and started handing out books, children would flog to them
to see what they were. Does this imply the US has no books in it's education
system?

(Sadly you are a product of that education system which speaks volumes)