From: Jonathan Kirwan on
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:29:27 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:01:58 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan
><jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:33:28 -0700, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:04:21 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan
>>><jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>But the real question is, why are you so obsessive about US politics?
>>>>>We ignore your politics, so it's only fair that you ignore ours.
>>>>
>>>>I know you already know the answer to this. You couldn't possibly not
>>>>know. So you must be just pretending ignorance.
>>>>
>>>>No one ignores the elephant in their midst.
>>>
>>>How is the US "in your midst?"
>>
>>You really are being insincere. I think you already know what I was
>>talking about. If not, I'm sorry for you, but not willing to play
>>some inane game with you on it. Everyone with any intelligence at all
>>knows exactly what's meant.
>
>Can't argue with that sort of reasoning.

It wasn't reasoning. Just an observation.

Jon
From: rtngw on
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:21:21 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:40:23 +0100, Eeyore
>>John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> And sometimes 2 is fundamental and just can't be 2.00000001.
>>
>>I suggest you see a psychiatrist.
>
> I'm having fun and you're not. Which one of us needs therapy?
>
> (The question is actually serious.)

Well, it is theoretically possible to have 2.00000001 apples, albeit
a little challenging to get it accurate. ;-)

But can you go to the store 3.14159 times? ;-P
(yeah, I know, only if it's a "pi" shop...)

Cheers!
Rich

From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:18:26 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:36:51 +0100, Eeyore
>
>>When does Bush get impeached ?
>
> Not worth the bother. His term expires in 2008.
>
>>When does the Republican Party get impeached ?
>
> Sorry, there's no provision for impeaching a party.
>
> But the real question is, why are you so obsessive about US politics? We
> ignore your politics, so it's only fair that you ignore ours.
>

He's afraid of becoming a victim of "collateral damage", or maybe
"friendly fire".

Thanks,
Rich


From: JoeBloe on
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:35:27 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

>
>COMSEC is not _limited_ to hardware.


Idiot! You just declared in another post that it was not about
hardware in any way. Get your guesses straight, dipshit.
From: JoeBloe on
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:35:55 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

>Wow. You really do exist in a dream world.
>
I'll take that as a no that you know nothing about her demise or
what followed.