Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 11:30 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:5ah4j2hgtlnsn7hm3rd7tu05nhdgdfg5lf(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:11:24 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan > <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> Gave us: > >>So it was a game with _me_, then. I'll remember that. > > > Don't go away mad... just go away. Yeah, you've got the mad angle pretty much squared away.
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 11:34 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:qoh4j2pd223i64iesmkpae1dm9ernurhou(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:40:35 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Are you going to imply so holy act took place which meant her body was >>free >>of the ravages of decay or something? >> > > It is a well known fact that she lay in state for many weeks without > having been embalmed, and it was said that there was no odor. > > You decide, chump. Ok, it was a miracle. Hallelujah. The pope should fast track her on the road to saint hood. Obviously not that well known though. Some authorative citations would be nice, but I don't mind because I don't care. Feel free to read through your post, with an objective approach if you are able, and see if you can spot why it is funny rather than "argument winning." When you try to post something which is _your_ opinion you come across like a medieval gossip rather than some one who lives in the worlds only superpower.
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 11:38 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:bmh4j2d77br4hfvi6bpt28sj4rj7o5hffj(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:36:41 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>I agree. You really should. > > In the habit of post editing folks words now? How quaint. Well, as you seem more than happy to remove anythin resembling context in other people's posts I didnt think you would mind. Obviously I forgot how hypocritical you can be. > It's a shame I can't come over there and post edit your face. Why not? Are you banned from leaving your house? I will be in the US soon on business if you want to meet up. You can talk as hard as you like on USENET. In reality you obviously have all manner of issues so I would hardly deem you a threat to even small children, let alone an adult. Please, keep on building these smokescreens to evade having to actually answer the questions. I realise you cant keep up with the flow of conversation (with USENET being such a _fast_ exchange media) but if you tried to answer each post it would help. Replying to the voices in your head is getting you no where.
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 11:40 T Wake wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > > > >>Are you going to imply so holy act took place which meant her body was > >>freeof the ravages of decay or something? > >> > > > > It is a well known fact that she lay in state for many weeks without > > having been embalmed, and it was said that there was no odor. > > > > You decide, chump. > > Ok, it was a miracle. Hallelujah. The pope should fast track her on the road > to saint hood. > > Obviously not that well known though. Some authorative citations would be > nice, but I don't mind because I don't care. > > Feel free to read through your post, with an objective approach if you are > able, and see if you can spot why it is funny rather than "argument > winning." > > When you try to post something which is _your_ opinion you come across like > a medieval gossip rather than some one who lives in the worlds only > superpower. A classic problem with the religiously 'inspired', sorry, - fooled. If JB was a Muslim, I dare say he'd want to wage a jihad against the west. Graham
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 11:48
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:11i4j2tj66p71khf77ff9jis600u4njpc7(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:00:19 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Police are accountable to the people they police... > > Bullshit. The bastards do whatever they want, and unless it gets > captured on tape, they get away with whatever they want. So, you are saying that the Police should be allowed to do what ever they want or that your country is mistaken for allowing the police to do what ever they want? > They even commit crimes in hiding the crimes they commit. > > Try again, asswipe. Your logic, as always, escapes me. I say the police are accountable and you counter argue complaining that the police in your country aren't but imply they should be. Amazing. Police forces are, or should be, accountable to the people they police. There is a tacit agreement between the populace and the police that this is so. Police forces are, generally, vastly out numbered by the people. When this agreement breaks down civil disorder ensues. For America to be the "world police" it needs to establish this mutual trust. Anything else will simply produce police hating rogue states in the same manner that your police's behaviour has turned you into an "oddity." |