From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 08:54 John Larkin wrote: > "T Wake"<usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >Its interesting that the other "non wins" you mention are from almost > >>>> >200 years ago. We have lost more recent wars as well. We can > >>>> >compare this to Vietnam, I suppose. > >>>> > >>>> Which was a French mess and a continuation of WWII. > >>> > >>>It had ZILCH to do with WW2. > >>> > >>>Graham > >> > >> How could *anything* that happened after WWII have zilch to do with > >> WWII? > > > >Arguing against a semantic mistake with another semantic mistake is not a > >good idea. > > > >Are you saying the US Invasion of Afghanistan was due to WWII? > > Certainly. Good Lord. In which case it must be due to WW1 too. Graham
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 08:55 "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Jonathan Kirwan wrote: > > > > No one ignores the elephant in their midst. > > You really do need to stop drinking so much. He didn't say it was pink ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 09:04 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote > > > How is the US "in your midst?" > > I dunno, seems pretty obvious to me that the pathological politics in the > self-proclaimed world-cop and most powerful nation in the world *is* > critically important to every other nation on earth, and those other nations > would be extremely foolish to "ignore ours". http://imdb.com/title/tt0372588/ World Joke more likely. Graham
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 09:07 John Larkin wrote: > Didn't you see the pic I posted? > > http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/10/koreaREU121006_548x700.jpg > > That's what this is all about Bringing electricity to N Korea ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 09:09
lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote > > > It's hard to give up the cop > > business after doing it for so long. > > Yep, therein lies the whole problem, along with the extremely fine > distinction between legitimately policing world security and bullying. Part of the problem I suspect is that the USA is now addicted to pushing foreigners around. Graham |