From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 19:59 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:11:38 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:c3f5j2di76enggbaabefl3js2mo5570n4f(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:18:44 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >>>and the USA would have been seen as liberating heroes. >> >> We were, you retarded fuckhead. > >Really? Who by? > All of Kuwait, for one. I would also point to the day Saddam's statue was felled. Or do you think all those Iraqis cheering were paid for? Or some other lame baby bullshit like "they were afraid".
From: Jamie on 15 Oct 2006 23:24 Eeyore wrote: > > Jonathan Kirwan wrote: > > >>On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:17:57 -0700, JoeBloe >><joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> >> >>><snip> >>>I know my rights, and the law you twits keep spewing on about will >>>get shot down in the supreme court, whether by me or another. >> >>Actually, I hope you are right about the Supreme Court on this >>subject. > > > You think ppl *should* be allowed to use the net to harass or threaten > other ppl ? > > Graham > You're a twisted individual, you tell us ? -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 20:00 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:21:05 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >JoeBloe wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >JoeBloe wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >> >> >It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the >> >> >Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy." >> >> >> >> My intent is not to annoy. If you get annoyed, that's your problem. >> > >> >It's now your problem sunshine. >> > >> >You can fix that ( the federal offence ) by posting using your real name btw. >> > >> I do not have a problem, dipshit. >> >> Over here "offence" is not a word. That is aside from the fact that >> no such violation has taken place. > >Maybe. Maybe not. > >You're in violation of your ISP's AUP though. You are one fucked up little cry baby.
From: Jamie on 15 Oct 2006 23:25 Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >> >>>Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>JoeBloe wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Why not? Are you banned from leaving your house? I will be in the US >>>>>>>soon on business if you want to meet up. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's called the law. And, no, I do not want to meet you, jackass. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would surely end up in prison for removing your voluntary capacity >>>>>>to use oxygen. >>>>> >>>>>I'd watch it if I were you. >>>>> >>>>>That could be seen as a threat. >>>> >>>>Especially given that new law that applies in the US, about threats >>>>made under pseudonyms, discussed elsewhere in sci.electronics. :) >>> >>> Since it isn't a threat to begin with, dipshit, it has no bearing. >> >>Really? >> >>"I would surely end up in prison for removing your voluntary capacity to use >>oxygen." >> >>Carries an implied threat.You can wax lyrical about how it's not a "threat" >>but the reality is, it was. >> >>That said, I find you about as frightening as a garden gnome so you really >>will have to try harder if you want to either impress or intimidate me. If >>you want to do neither, why do you keep pretending you can beat me in a >>fight? > > > Under the law it has merely to be perceived as a threat to come under its > jurisdiction. After all, any thug can say "I didn't really mean it " ! > > Graham You're living proof!. -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: Jamie on 15 Oct 2006 23:26
Eeyore wrote: > > T Wake wrote: > > >>why do you[JB] keep pretending you can beat me in a fight? > > > It's the only way he knows of 'winning an argument' suince his mental capacity > is too feeble to do it the normal way. > > Graham > > maybe, he is lowering him self to your level ? -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5 |