Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 12:26 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Western civilization puts value on human life; this is one > of the things that people, known as our enemies, want to change. You're quite mad. Graham
From: Jamie on 16 Oct 2006 15:29 T Wake wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > news:rsh5j25m4n4adb00is9jqmg5jgh7v47hae(a)4ax.com... > >>On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:57:05 +0100, "T Wake" >><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >> >>>How did you intend "Were it a face to face confrontation, I'd just crush >>>your pathetic twit throat with a single stroke." to be taken? >> >> >> That was my response to YOU talking about how a fight between us >>would turn out. You should see someone about that Alzheimer's problem >>you are sporting, sport. > > > Well, all I said was we could meet up - you were the first to claim you were > going to "post edit my face." > > You then claim you will [insert various threat] and then back down. > > You are really funny. > > are you sure he backed down? may he just threw in some bate, and is waiting for you to barry your self ? -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 12:38 Lloyd Parker wrote: > JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > > > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are not > >moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not be > >a crime. > > You are lying. I suspect it's what he learnt at Church. American Christian fundamentalists are as dangerous if not more so than their Muslim counterparts. Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 12:41 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >John Fields wrote: > >> > >> >> You seem to forget one tiny little detail, and that's that we didn't > >> >> go after Saddam Hussein for the WTC, we went after him because of > >> >> his defiance of the UN, his refusal to comply with their sanctions > >> >> and inspections, and our belief that he was either developing, or in > >> >> possession of, WMD. > >> > > >> >You mean the fiction you invented. > >> > >> --- > >> So you think it was about the WTC even though UBL admitted > >> responsibility for that? > > > >The fiction about the supposed weapons. > > --- > The jury's still out on that one. No it's not. Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Oct 2006 12:42
John Fields wrote: > We know for sure that he used chemical weapons on his own people, Not since the Kuwait busines, > that he was trying to build that big gun before he got busted, Not since the Kuwait business. > that > he was refusing unscheduled inspections, So why not work on that ? > and that he was stealing > the humanitarian aid money which was meant for his people. Pass. > Sounds to me like grounds enough to take out his machine. Not to me. Graham |