From: chrisv on 22 Mar 2010 13:51 nospam wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> "Additional cost" is an extremely lame, dare I say "asinine", excuse for >> not having USB ports in a premium-priced product like the iPad. > >if the typical user isn't going to use the usb ports, it's a waste of >money, LOL If they were there, they'd get used, by many, and hardly a "waste". Idiot. >regardless of cost. the ipad is also not premium priced. Yes, it is. >in fact, people were surprised that it didn't cost *more*. Did you forget the word "some" in front of the word "people", Apple fanboi? Like many other Apple products, the "cost to purchase" is subsidized by expected sales of applications and media. I recently bought a Dell Linux netbook with a 1.6GHz Atom processor for $240. Oh, and it has USB ports (and an SD-card slot).
From: nospam on 22 Mar 2010 13:54 In article <mtafq55elpvos9q2dbdb2flfjjitrq7u89(a)4ax.com>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > I recently bought a Dell Linux netbook with a 1.6GHz Atom processor > for $240. Oh, and it has USB ports (and an SD-card slot). great. what does that have to do with an ipad? the fact that you think the ipad is some sort of netbook replacement is why you don't understand that the lack of usb ports makes no difference in how a typical user will be using the device.
From: chrisv on 22 Mar 2010 13:59 nospam wrote: >the fact that you think the ipad is some sort of netbook replacement Idiot. I think no such thing. I was merely pointing-out that USB ports are quite affordable, on even the cost-sensitive products like netbooks, much less the premium-priced iPad.
From: nospam on 22 Mar 2010 14:09 In article <2rbfq5h8ta7ufvur32rddr7qu8id8sm1pn(a)4ax.com>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > I was merely pointing-out that USB ports are quite affordable, on even > the cost-sensitive products like netbooks, much less the > premium-priced iPad. different product, different use. just because a netbook has a particular thing doesn't mean an ipad must also have it.
From: chrisv on 22 Mar 2010 14:30
nospam wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> I was merely pointing-out that USB ports are quite affordable, on even >> the cost-sensitive products like netbooks, much less the >> premium-priced iPad. > >different product, different use. just because a netbook has a >particular thing doesn't mean an ipad must also have it. USB ports would be "good to have" on the iPad. Stop apologizing for Apple's customer-hostile designs. |