From: nospam on 22 Mar 2010 14:33 In article <qndfq5lk9tb6fj5c9eug2ndnb5ohnfref8(a)4ax.com>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > USB ports would be "good to have" on the iPad. why? it's not an issue for the ipod touch, and after all, isn't the ipad just a big ipod touch?
From: chrisv on 22 Mar 2010 15:03 nospam wrote: > why? Idiot.
From: nospam on 22 Mar 2010 15:05 In article <pan.2010.03.22.19.03.33.159838(a)nospam.invalid>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > > why? > > Idiot. in other words, there's no reason for separate usb ports. that's why it's not there.
From: chrisv on 22 Mar 2010 15:34 nospam wrote: >In article <pan.2010.03.22.19.03.33.159838(a)nospam.invalid>, chrisv ><chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> > why? >> >> Idiot. > >in other words, there's no reason for separate usb ports. > >that's why it's not there. Idiot.
From: nospam on 22 Mar 2010 15:37
In article <2hhfq5p14g558qeq0hitr5fklfc4419luh(a)4ax.com>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > Idiot. very compelling argument to add usb ports. not. |