From: nospam on
In article <qndfq5lk9tb6fj5c9eug2ndnb5ohnfref8(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
<chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> USB ports would be "good to have" on the iPad.

why?

it's not an issue for the ipod touch, and after all, isn't the ipad
just a big ipod touch?
From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

> why?

Idiot.


From: nospam on
In article <pan.2010.03.22.19.03.33.159838(a)nospam.invalid>, chrisv
<chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> > why?
>
> Idiot.

in other words, there's no reason for separate usb ports.

that's why it's not there.
From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <pan.2010.03.22.19.03.33.159838(a)nospam.invalid>, chrisv
><chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> > why?
>>
>> Idiot.
>
>in other words, there's no reason for separate usb ports.
>
>that's why it's not there.

Idiot.

From: nospam on
In article <2hhfq5p14g558qeq0hitr5fklfc4419luh(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
<chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> Idiot.

very compelling argument to add usb ports. not.