Pack a Gun to Protect Valuables from Airline Theft or Loss?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jan 2010 15:25 Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: > Savageduck >>Yeeeees, but all of this is still hypothetical, and there is still no >>proof of intent to smuggle a weapon into Canada and possess it >>illegally. > >They don't need to do that. >You and your unlicensed firearm are in Canada. That is illegal. Technically no, it is not in Canada. People and goods are not in Canada until they clear immigration and customs. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: C J Campbell on 23 Jan 2010 17:44 On 2010-01-23 12:25:52 -0800, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) said: > Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >> Savageduck > >>> Yeeeees, but all of this is still hypothetical, and there is still no >>> proof of intent to smuggle a weapon into Canada and possess it >>> illegally. >> >> They don't need to do that. >> You and your unlicensed firearm are in Canada. That is illegal. > > Technically no, it is not in Canada. People and goods are not in > Canada until they clear immigration and customs. Technically they are in Canada. An illegal immigrant or smuggled item is in Canada whether they have cleared customs and immigration or not. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jan 2010 17:46 C J Campbell <christophercampbellremovethis(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) said: >> Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>> Savageduck >> >>>> Yeeeees, but all of this is still hypothetical, and there is still no >>>> proof of intent to smuggle a weapon into Canada and possess it >>>> illegally. >>> >>> They don't need to do that. >>> You and your unlicensed firearm are in Canada. That is illegal. >> >> Technically no, it is not in Canada. People and goods are not in >> Canada until they clear immigration and customs. > >Technically they are in Canada. Not according to the law. Airports set aside areas that are legally outside of the host country. > An illegal immigrant or smuggled item >is in Canada Not legally. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Chris H on 24 Jan 2010 05:48 In message <4b5b7c54$0$1677$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer <rfischer(a)sonic.net> writes >C J Campbell <christophercampbellremovethis(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) said: >>> Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>>> Savageduck >>> >>>>> Yeeeees, but all of this is still hypothetical, and there is still no >>>>> proof of intent to smuggle a weapon into Canada and possess it >>>>> illegally. >>>> >>>> They don't need to do that. >>>> You and your unlicensed firearm are in Canada. That is illegal. >>> >>> Technically no, it is not in Canada. People and goods are not in >>> Canada until they clear immigration and customs. >> >>Technically they are in Canada. > >Not according to the law. Airports set aside areas that are legally >outside of the host country. > >> An illegal immigrant or smuggled item >>is in Canada > >Not legally. Due to the US paranoia on terrorism these "rules" get bent when there is a "suspect terrorist" Besides the US is more known for breaking international law than observing it. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Savageduck on 24 Jan 2010 11:21
On 2010-01-24 07:41:23 -0800, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> said: >> > > The way this falls in the thread, it seems as if you are saying that > California is not part of the United States. Yes, I know that's not > what you mean, but there *are* people who think that parts of > California are part of some other planet. I know what you mean, I consider the entire L.A. basin an entity foreign to me and detrimental to my physical and mental health. It is to be avoided at all costs, only to be visited when circumstances dictate every 3-4 years or so. L.A. is not representative of all California, I am a Central Coast kind of guy. ;-) -- Regards, Savageduck |