Physics Group Splinters Over Global Warming Review
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Tom Potter, you'd win more battles if you were part of something bigger.
Next: What is the biggest size of Molecule?
From: Pavor Nocturnus on 30 Dec 2009 19:32 On Dec 28, 9:46 pm, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote: > Interesting that a senior CBS correspondant wrote this. > If a blogger is a correspondent, what's that make you? You can't even spell correspondent.
From: Sam Wormley on 30 Dec 2009 19:41 On 12/30/09 5:43 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >>> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/30/09 10:45 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:40 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Until a few dacades ago, Peter. The CO2 ain'y been this high for >>>>>> 15,000,000 years! >>>>> >>>>> Actually, he just debunked that. More fraud on the part of the AGW >>>>> advocates. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Marvin, you should invest in some glasses. As of March 2009, >>>> carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is at a concentration >>>> of 387 ppm by volume and increasing at a rate of 1.7 ppm per >>>> year. >>> >>> Caused by what? >>> Evidence your claim. Here. >>> >>> Btw, show me the data set for your 15 mio. years claim. >>> Where is it? >>> And don't come up with Google now. >>> I want to see YOUR data set you are referring to. >> >> As I told Marvin... the concentration and rate of increase >> in concentration of CO2 is an observable, and undeniable >> observable. > > I'm not talking about the last 130 years here. > Have YOU observed the als 15 mio. yaears? How? > > >> As for the cause, there is more and more evidence suggesting >> that human activity (deforestation, cement production, fossil >> fuel burning) is a contributing factor. > > There is NONE, and you know this. > Repeatedly parroting this AGW bollocks doesn't make it more credible. > > >> Peter, why don't you take global climate change seriously? > > Oh, I take it as it is, a natural variation. > Nothing serious and nothing dooming. > This you should do also. > > > Sit down, get data sets and do some research on your own, instead of posting > bite-sized more or less false graphs and science. What's false about the data and graphs I've linked in posting, Peter? You better have a better answer than repeatedly saying they are lies, etc.
From: I M on 30 Dec 2009 21:31 On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:10:47 -0600, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12/30/09 10:45 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:40 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> >>>>> Until a few dacades ago, Peter. The CO2 ain'y been this high for >>>>> 15,000,000 years! >>>> >>>> Actually, he just debunked that. More fraud on the part of the AGW >>>> advocates. >>>> >>> >>> Marvin, you should invest in some glasses. As of March 2009, >>> carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is at a concentration >>> of 387 ppm by volume and increasing at a rate of 1.7 ppm per >>> year. >> >> Caused by what? >> Evidence your claim. Here. >> >> Btw, show me the data set for your 15 mio. years claim. >> Where is it? >> And don't come up with Google now. >> I want to see YOUR data set you are referring to. > > As I told Marvin... the concentration and rate of increase > in concentration of CO2 is an observable, and undeniable > observable. > > As for the cause, there is more and more evidence suggesting > that human activity (deforestation, cement production, fossil > fuel burning) is a contributing factor. > > Peter, why don't you take global climate change seriously? I take it seriously, but I don't have to like the colder than normal weather and the resulting bigger heating bills, I even have to let faucets run when the temperature goes 10 degrees below normal. Move about 800 miles east and see how you like it, but wait till spring, some of the roads may be closed.
From: I M on 30 Dec 2009 21:34 On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:27:00 +0100, Rav1ng rabbit <rabb1t(a)dot.com> wrote: >Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >>> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/30/09 10:45 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:40 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Until a few dacades ago, Peter. The CO2 ain'y been this high for >>>>>> 15,000,000 years! >>>>> >>>>> Actually, he just debunked that. More fraud on the part of the AGW >>>>> advocates. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Marvin, you should invest in some glasses. As of March 2009, >>>> carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is at a concentration >>>> of 387 ppm by volume and increasing at a rate of 1.7 ppm per >>>> year. >>> >>> Caused by what? >>> Evidence your claim. Here. >>> >>> Btw, show me the data set for your 15 mio. years claim. >>> Where is it? >>> And don't come up with Google now. >>> I want to see YOUR data set you are referring to. >> >> As I told Marvin... the concentration and rate of increase >> in concentration of CO2 is an observable, and undeniable >> observable. >> >> As for the cause, there is more and more evidence suggesting >> that human activity (deforestation, cement production, fossil >> fuel burning) is a contributing factor. >> >> Peter, why don't you take global climate change seriously? >> > >Peter likes to generate a lot of noise, unable to accept any facts, >taken away by a crumbling right wing ideology. > >Q The AGW nutcases are so far left they think JFK was right wing. Your posts are so perverted from reality, I am sorry every time I read one instead of deleting it unseen as I do the other nuts.
From: Sam Wormley on 30 Dec 2009 22:26
On 12/30/09 8:31 PM, I M @ good guy wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:10:47 -0600, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >>> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/30/09 10:45 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:40 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Until a few dacades ago, Peter. The CO2 ain'y been this high for >>>>>> 15,000,000 years! >>>>> >>>>> Actually, he just debunked that. More fraud on the part of the AGW >>>>> advocates. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Marvin, you should invest in some glasses. As of March 2009, >>>> carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is at a concentration >>>> of 387 ppm by volume and increasing at a rate of 1.7 ppm per >>>> year. >>> >>> Caused by what? >>> Evidence your claim. Here. >>> >>> Btw, show me the data set for your 15 mio. years claim. >>> Where is it? >>> And don't come up with Google now. >>> I want to see YOUR data set you are referring to. >> >> As I told Marvin... the concentration and rate of increase >> in concentration of CO2 is an observable, and undeniable >> observable. >> >> As for the cause, there is more and more evidence suggesting >> that human activity (deforestation, cement production, fossil >> fuel burning) is a contributing factor. >> >> Peter, why don't you take global climate change seriously? > > > I take it seriously, but I don't have > to like the colder than normal weather > and the resulting bigger heating bills, > I even have to let faucets run when > the temperature goes 10 degrees > below normal. > > Move about 800 miles east and > see how you like it, but wait till spring, > some of the roads may be closed. > You appear to easily confuse local weather and global climate. |