From: Sam Wormley on
On 1/1/10 10:19 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:

>
> And you know the data is utter bullshit because 1938 (aprox) was about as
> warm as 1998, within a small fraction of a degree, and was probably the
> warmest year of the 20th century. The real temperatures are hidden by
> Hansen's bullshit "Global-Mean Surface Temperature Anomaly" parameter,
> which is basically whatever the nutjob Hansen says it is.

See:
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-01-14-globalaveragetemperaturesnoaa.gif
From: Sam Wormley on
On 1/1/10 10:29 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:

>
> I wonder if he even reads what's posted.

Climate Monitoring
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/anomalies/index.html

From: Sam Wormley on
On 1/1/10 10:37 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:09:28 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> On 1/1/10 10:03 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We have a Fortran source code that is even COMMENTED that it is
>>> applying a 'fudge factor' and there is no rational reason at all for it
>>> to be there other than to support an argument that you know is false.
>>
>> Why don't you post that FORTRAN Code (or a link to it) so we may
>> scrutinize.
>
> You won't scrutinize. You never have a critical eye. You just look at the
> day and claim it is night. Those of us who CARE about science have
> already looked at it and saw what a laughably outrageous piece of code it
> was. They clearly didn't think anyone would ever look at it.
>
> Just go away Wormely, You just didn't lose your credibility; you shot it,
> poisoned it, ran a tank over it, fed it to a wood chipper and then fed it
> to the pigs.

Marvin is afraid to post the FORTRAN code as it will likely
show he just blustering some more and doesn't even understand
the code! Post the FORTRAN Marvin!


From: Marvin the Martian on
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:35:44 -0800, Ilja wrote:

> On 29 Dez. 2009, 23:47, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote:
>> The problem is the whores who will take the money and give the
>> politicians whatever results they want. These aren't scientist, they're
>> whores.
>
> No, the problem is the way how scientists are paid. It makes them
> whores.
>
> Give a scientist a secure job (teaching at a university, nothing else,
> publishing papers as his hobby, no grants) and you obtain independent
> scientist who are able to tell you the truth without being afraid of
> loosing
> their jobs. (No, not loosing their jobs, but simply not getting a new
> one.)
> Almost everybody has more job security. But job security is the basis of
> independence.
>
> Make them dependent on science managers who distribute grants, and you
> obtain whores.

I agree. I've seen how the process "works". You never "debunk" a bad
idea. You say it needs "further study".
From: Sam Wormley on
Scientific Evidence
Increasing Temperatures & Greenhouse Gases

http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/scientific_evidence.htm

http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/images/Forcings_Anthro.jpg

http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/images/Forcings_Both.jpg