The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 25 Sep 2007 22:56 On Sep 25, 7:26 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:54:01 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself will take care of > >supplying all the spare/surplus capacity of clean renewable energy for > >creating such nifty products of stored energy, > > Hey, talk to Warren lately? How'd he doing? > > John He's doing loads better off than most of us combined, and he's damn proud of it. Must have a little something to do with all of that renewable and clean energy he's providing us, with nearly unlimited future potential of customers that'll soon enough pay damn near anything his equipment can supply. Perhaps he should change his name to Warren Enron Buffett. - Brad Guth -
From: Eeyore on 25 Sep 2007 23:27 BradGuth wrote: > John Larkin wrote: > > BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >The likes of Warren Buffett, William Mook and myself will take care of > > >supplying all the spare/surplus capacity of clean renewable energy for > > >creating such nifty products of stored energy, > > > > Hey, talk to Warren lately? How'd he doing? > > > He's doing loads better off than most of us combined, and he's damn > proud of it. Must have a little something to do with all of that > renewable and clean energy he's providing us What clean energy is that ? Graham
From: John Larkin on 25 Sep 2007 23:44 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:49:19 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 25, 7:02 pm, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:28:58 -0700, bill <ford_prefec...(a)hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> H2O2 sounds like nasty, dangerous, expensive stuff: >> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide >> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide#Hazards >> >> >> "The saying is 'peroxides kill chemists'" >> >> >> John >> >> > now you've done it, you have blasphemed about guth's god of h2o2, >> >any mention of the serious and severe dangers with handling, >> >manufacture and storage of high purity h2o2 provoke full armed >> >responses from that particular stupid freak. >> >> And it still sounds line an insanely inefficient way to transport >> oxygen for combustion. Not to mention dangerous. >> >> Still, it's interesting. >> >> John > >Insane is a good sign, as it means there's something worth doing >unless you're a wuss. Ideas need to be tempered by physical and economic feasibility. Since atmospheric oxygen is free, and nitrogen oxides aren't a serious problem, why transport a full molecule of water around, in an expensive, dangerous, unstable carrier, just to transport half a molecule of oxygen? >Question; are we trying to minimize pollution as well as the use of >fossil fuels, or not? How much pollution would you create by manufacturing all that aluminum and H2O2? Look up the processes; both are very, very nasty. John
From: JosephKK on 26 Sep 2007 04:01 BradGuth bradguth(a)gmail.com posted to sci.electronics.design: > On Sep 25, 7:02 pm, John Larkin > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:28:58 -0700, bill >> <ford_prefec...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> H2O2 sounds like nasty, dangerous, expensive stuff: >> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide >> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide#Hazards >> >> >> "The saying is 'peroxides kill chemists'" >> >> >> John >> >> > now you've done it, you have blasphemed about guth's god of >> > h2o2, >> >any mention of the serious and severe dangers with handling, >> >manufacture and storage of high purity h2o2 provoke full armed >> >responses from that particular stupid freak. >> >> And it still sounds line an insanely inefficient way to transport >> oxygen for combustion. Not to mention dangerous. >> >> Still, it's interesting. >> >> John > > Insane is a good sign, as it means there's something worth doing > unless you're a wuss. > > Question; are we trying to minimize pollution as well as the use of > fossil fuels, or not? > - Brad Guth - So wuss, when are you going to build an 100 mpg vehicle.
From: JosephKK on 26 Sep 2007 04:13
Jim Thompson To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com posted to sci.electronics.design: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:07:32 -0400, Robert Adsett > <sub2(a)aeolusdevelopment.com> wrote: > >>In article <46F8E113.D8A821F1(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says... >>> >>> >>> BradGuth wrote: >>> >>> > The 0.0001% of solar energy and the 0.0000001% of the Earth/moon >>> > energy is in fact sustaining some limited portion on behalf the >>> > likes of your pathetic life >> >>My. >> >>So I take it Brad can live without the nutrients and oxygen >>generated by the ecosystem's use of the sun's energy? >> >>> >>> 'Earth Moon energy' is another of Brad's psychotic delusions. >> >>Well, there is energy in the orbital system and some tidal power >>systems >>have been built to extract some. Even if it were possible you >>wouldn't want to take a significant fraction of the energy out of >>the system. Imagine the consequences! >> >>Robert > > "Imagine" is not in Brad's capabilities. He's just a parrot of the > science fiction magazines. > > ...Jim Thompson I read science fiction mags from time to time and never saw anything like his lunatic ravings; Brad must be reading astrology or alchemy magazines. |