From: Rich Grise on 8 Oct 2007 11:46 On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:07:15 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: > In sci.physics, Rich Grise >> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:15:56 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: >> >>> Besides, the general idea is *not* to use fossil fuels >>> whatsoever, if I understood you correctly. H2O2, >>> presumably, would simply replace them, distributed in gas >>> stations much like gasoline is today. >>> >>> (Yeah, right.) >> >> Well, if it wasn't so expensive, and resource-hungry, > > Why would the engine be resource-hungry? I didn't. I said that making H2O2 is expensive and resource-hungry. Thanks, Rich
From: Charlie Edmondson on 8 Oct 2007 14:37 Willie.Mookie(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > I already posted a few of the ones that appear in English. There are > lots in Indonesian and Chinese and Japanese. > > Bottom line I have the investors I need and I'm fixed for projects and > money now. The only reason I'm talking about it at all, is that you > are asking the questions. Recall this started out as a description of > where I thought the solar energy market was going. You really > couldn't say anything against the technical descriptions I've offered, > so you are now going out of your way, after enlisting help from your > buddy here, to attack me personally. haha. comparing me to crooks you > have known and making similar outlandish statements - for no damn good > reason. > > One must wonder what motivates you to do all this. > > This is all due to the fact that you don't want to admit that I'm > right about the costs and limitatoins of direct connect solar to the > power grid? haha.. What a weak person you must be. > > Hi Bill, Like I said, if you get a 30-60 foot string extra, say at the tail end of a production run, or maybe isolated by a flaw during processing, I will be glad to 'take' them off your hands for experimentation and testing! ;-) I have a nice wall and slope with good southern exposure just up from my pools solar panels... Charlie
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2007 15:01 On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 07:16:56 -0700, Fred Abse <excretatauris(a)cerebrumconfus.it> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:29:23 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > >>>Squirting LOX into a cylinder will tend to cool everything off >>>rather quickly, and perhaps too quickly. >> >> Rocket engines don't seem to mind. > >Have you read Richard Feynman's (MHRIP) additional comments to the >Challenger disaster inquiry report? He wasn't impressed with the service >life of the LOX pumps, amongst other things. Feed pumps are always a big problem on rockets. They have to be light, enormously powerful, pump nasty stuff, and are designed to run under major stress for a couple of minutes. John
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2007 15:05 On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:33:46 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 29, 2:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...(a)example.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:52:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote: >> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:28:41 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>On Sep 28, 2:46 pm, rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >>> Well I guess you could go for a rotary engine as well. Or anything you >> >>> wanted if you design it yourself. >> >>> The nice thing is, that the fuel system, is the simplest part. When a >> >>> bigcarcompany like GM sets out to make a conceptcar, they spend >> >>> millions. With HHO or whatever water system you can invent, it costs >> >>> little to make the thing. >> >>> So then you just put it in a nicecar. >> >> >>> These guys here send acarbuilder to your house, and help you build a >> >>>car, in less than 7 days,http://www.lonestarclassics.com/index.cfm >> >> >>> Here is a conceptcar, that someone is building from scratch as a >> >>> hobby.http://www.baileyspeed.com/ >> >>>http://www.kitcarsforum.com/b1-concept-kit-project-t8766.0.html >> >> >>Actually any old existingcarwill do just fine and dandy with my h2o2/ >> >>c12h26 IC engine. I could get a 1956 Buick or even a Ford Edsel up to >> >>100+ empg without hardly trying, and at zero NOx to boot. >> >> > "Could"? Then why don't you do it? >> >> He probably wants to scare up some "funding" first. ;-) > >I certainly love getting my hands on just 10% of what similar R&D >efforts get. Have your pal Warren write you a check. John
From: Rich Grise on 8 Oct 2007 15:23
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 02:03:54 +0000, Willie.Mookie wrote: > > This is all due to the fact that you don't want to admit that I'm right > about the costs and limitatoins of direct connect solar to the power grid? > haha.. What a weak person you must be. We'll be happy to admit anything you say, just as soon as you show us one. Good Luck! Rich |