From: Rich Grise on
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:07:15 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> In sci.physics, Rich Grise
>> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:15:56 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>
>>> Besides, the general idea is *not* to use fossil fuels
>>> whatsoever, if I understood you correctly. H2O2,
>>> presumably, would simply replace them, distributed in gas
>>> stations much like gasoline is today.
>>>
>>> (Yeah, right.)
>>
>> Well, if it wasn't so expensive, and resource-hungry,
>
> Why would the engine be resource-hungry?

I didn't. I said that making H2O2 is expensive and resource-hungry.

Thanks,
Rich

From: Charlie Edmondson on
Willie.Mookie(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> I already posted a few of the ones that appear in English. There are
> lots in Indonesian and Chinese and Japanese.
>
> Bottom line I have the investors I need and I'm fixed for projects and
> money now. The only reason I'm talking about it at all, is that you
> are asking the questions. Recall this started out as a description of
> where I thought the solar energy market was going. You really
> couldn't say anything against the technical descriptions I've offered,
> so you are now going out of your way, after enlisting help from your
> buddy here, to attack me personally. haha. comparing me to crooks you
> have known and making similar outlandish statements - for no damn good
> reason.
>
> One must wonder what motivates you to do all this.
>
> This is all due to the fact that you don't want to admit that I'm
> right about the costs and limitatoins of direct connect solar to the
> power grid? haha.. What a weak person you must be.
>
>

Hi Bill,
Like I said, if you get a 30-60 foot string extra, say at the tail end
of a production run, or maybe isolated by a flaw during processing, I
will be glad to 'take' them off your hands for experimentation and
testing! ;-)

I have a nice wall and slope with good southern exposure just up from my
pools solar panels...

Charlie
From: John Larkin on
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 07:16:56 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris(a)cerebrumconfus.it> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:29:23 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>
>>>Squirting LOX into a cylinder will tend to cool everything off
>>>rather quickly, and perhaps too quickly.
>>
>> Rocket engines don't seem to mind.
>
>Have you read Richard Feynman's (MHRIP) additional comments to the
>Challenger disaster inquiry report? He wasn't impressed with the service
>life of the LOX pumps, amongst other things.

Feed pumps are always a big problem on rockets. They have to be light,
enormously powerful, pump nasty stuff, and are designed to run under
major stress for a couple of minutes.

John

From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:33:46 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sep 29, 2:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...(a)example.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:52:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:28:41 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>On Sep 28, 2:46 pm, rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >>> Well I guess you could go for a rotary engine as well. Or anything you
>> >>> wanted if you design it yourself.
>> >>> The nice thing is, that the fuel system, is the simplest part. When a
>> >>> bigcarcompany like GM sets out to make a conceptcar, they spend
>> >>> millions. With HHO or whatever water system you can invent, it costs
>> >>> little to make the thing.
>> >>> So then you just put it in a nicecar.
>>
>> >>> These guys here send acarbuilder to your house, and help you build a
>> >>>car, in less than 7 days,http://www.lonestarclassics.com/index.cfm
>>
>> >>> Here is a conceptcar, that someone is building from scratch as a
>> >>> hobby.http://www.baileyspeed.com/
>> >>>http://www.kitcarsforum.com/b1-concept-kit-project-t8766.0.html
>>
>> >>Actually any old existingcarwill do just fine and dandy with my h2o2/
>> >>c12h26 IC engine. I could get a 1956 Buick or even a Ford Edsel up to
>> >>100+ empg without hardly trying, and at zero NOx to boot.
>>
>> > "Could"? Then why don't you do it?
>>
>> He probably wants to scare up some "funding" first. ;-)
>
>I certainly love getting my hands on just 10% of what similar R&D
>efforts get.

Have your pal Warren write you a check.

John


From: Rich Grise on
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 02:03:54 +0000, Willie.Mookie wrote:
>
> This is all due to the fact that you don't want to admit that I'm right
> about the costs and limitatoins of direct connect solar to the power grid?
> haha.. What a weak person you must be.

We'll be happy to admit anything you say, just as soon as you show us
one.

Good Luck!
Rich