The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 8 Oct 2007 16:35 On Oct 8, 8:46 am, Rich Grise <r...(a)example.net> wrote: > On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:07:15 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: > > > In sci.physics, Rich Grise > >> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:15:56 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: > > >>> Besides, the general idea is *not* to use fossil fuels > >>> whatsoever, if I understood you correctly. H2O2, > >>> presumably, would simply replace them, distributed in gas > >>> stations much like gasoline is today. > > >>> (Yeah, right.) > > >> Well, if it wasn't so expensive, and resource-hungry, > > > Why would the engine be resource-hungry? > > I didn't. I said that makingH2O2is expensive and resource-hungry. > > Thanks, > Rich It obviously doesn't matter whatever you said, because they obviously don't like anything you have to share. - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 8 Oct 2007 16:40 On Oct 8, 12:05 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:33:46 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > >On Sep 29, 2:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...(a)example.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:52:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > >> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:28:41 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>On Sep 28, 2:46 pm, rick_so...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > >> >>> Well I guess you could go for a rotary engine as well. Or anything you > >> >>> wanted if you design it yourself. > >> >>> The nice thing is, that the fuel system, is the simplest part. When a > >> >>> bigcarcompany like GM sets out to make a conceptcar, they spend > >> >>> millions. With HHO or whatever water system you can invent, it costs > >> >>> little to make the thing. > >> >>> So then you just put it in a nicecar. > > >> >>> These guys here send acarbuilder to your house, and help you build a > >> >>>car, in less than 7 days,http://www.lonestarclassics.com/index.cfm > > >> >>> Here is a conceptcar, that someone is building from scratch as a > >> >>> hobby.http://www.baileyspeed.com/ > >> >>>http://www.kitcarsforum.com/b1-concept-kit-project-t8766.0.html > > >> >>Actually any old existingcarwill do just fine and dandy with myh2o2/ > >> >>c12h26 IC engine. I could get a 1956 Buick or even a Ford Edsel up to > >> >>100+ empg without hardly trying, and at zero NOx to boot. > > >> > "Could"? Then why don't you do it? > > >> He probably wants to scare up some "funding" first. ;-) > > >I certainly love getting my hands on just 10% of what similar R&D > >efforts get. > > Have your pal Warren write you a check. Might have to do just that, as obviously this is all far too complex for your pro big-energy and otherwise pro big-government head to deal with, much less constructively contribute squat. At least Warren Buffett knows a good future worthy investment when he sees one. - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 8 Oct 2007 16:43 On Oct 8, 12:24 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > Why do you and/or why would Warren Buffett hate the truth and > > otherwise have such disdain against our badly failing environment? > > Why do you continue to post your lies and hatred? Now that's our warm and fuzzy semitic Michael A. Terrell, isn't it. - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 8 Oct 2007 16:49 On Oct 8, 1:16 pm, Bill Ward <bw...(a)REMOVETHISix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:40:55 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > > > BradGuth wrote: > > >>h2o2as a monopropellant is only worth 2.9 Mj/kg > > > Monopropellant ? Are you planing on using it's 'fizz' to provide rocket > > style propulsion ? > > That's what the rocket backpack uses. Doesn't meet CAFE standards, > though. Nothing other than big-energy and/or big-government ever meets with your "CAFE standards", does it. Didn't you used to work for ENRON, or was it something worse? - Brad Guth -
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2007 18:35
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:22:07 -0700, Fred Abse <excretatauris(a)cerebrumconfus.it> wrote: >On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:24:07 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > >> [1] Funny how I always dislike guys named Larry. We have a friend who >> used to be Larry, nice guy, but last year he changed his name to >> Jerome. > >Reminds me of a bit of not-quite graffiti I saw in a rest area on I-5 in >Oregon (yes, I know, but I need to every couple of hours.) Someone had >stuck a neat thermal transfer tape label in one of the stalls: > >"Larry the label guy was here." Like the ski run with big signs that say CAUTION -- SIGNS John |