From: Rich Grise on
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:27:07 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:29:44 GMT, Glen Walpert <gwalpert(a)notaxs.com>

>>Yep, those are some big pumps with a lot of parts subject to corrosion,
>>erosion and wear. Rather different tradeoffs from the rocket feed
>>pumps.
>> I have done some work on these too, including the defunct Clinch River
>>Fast Breeder Reactor primary sodium pump seal. Hot liquid sodium
>>qualifies as a fairly nasty fluid - but only if it leaks :-).
>
> Speaking of nasty, in the 50's roughly, some power plants were built
> using mercury as the working fluid.
>

Once, in one of the engineering buildings at U of MN, there was sort
of a display - some guy had built an MHD device, which used about
a liter of mercury. This was in 1968 or so, before they made mercury
all toxic and stuff. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich


From: Rich Grise on
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:18:32 +0000, Willie.Mookie wrote:
>> I've known a few people who were very good at making money, in the sense
>> of making money for its own sake, without actually creating anything.
>
> Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money and
> not create value. That's what it means to make money. If you end up with
> a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then you are not
> a business person, you are a crook.

Either that or a lucky gambler. Ever heard of the "stock market"?

Cheers!
Rich

From: Richard Henry on
On Oct 9, 10:18 am, Willie.Moo...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money
> and not create value. That's what it means to make money.

Have you never heard of Kevin Trudeau?

> If you end
> up with a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then
> you are not a business person, you are a crook.

Oh, never mind, you have heard of him.


From: Willie.Mookie on
On Oct 9, 3:04 pm, Rich Grise <r...(a)example.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:18:32 +0000, Willie.Mookie wrote:
> >> I've known a few people who were very good at making money, in the sense
> >> of making money for its own sake, without actually creating anything.
>
> > Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money and
> > not create value. That's what it means to make money. If you end up with
> > a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then you are not
> > a business person, you are a crook.
>
> Either that or a lucky gambler. Ever heard of the "stock market"?
>
> Cheers!
> Rich

One may be lucky in the stock market certainly, but by far the
greatest amount of wealth is held by those who actually contribute
value.

Here is one descrition of the function of the stock market and its
value;

The stock market is one of the most important sources for companies to
raise money. This allows businesses to go public, or raise additional
capital for expansion. The liquidity that an exchange provides affords
investors the ability to quickly and easily sell securities. This is
an attractive feature of investing in stocks, compared to other less
liquid investments such as real estate.

History has shown that the price of shares and other assets is an
important part of the dynamics of economic activity, and can influence
or be an indicator of social mood. Rising share prices, for instance,
tend to be associated with increased business investment and vice
versa. Share prices also affect the wealth of households and their
consumption. Therefore, central banks tend to keep an eye on the
control and behavior of the stock market and, in general, on the
smooth operation of financial system functions. Financial stability is
the raison d'ĂȘtre of central banks.

Exchanges also act as the clearinghouse for each transaction, meaning
that they collect and deliver the shares, and guarantee payment to the
seller of a security. This eliminates the risk to an individual buyer
or seller that the counterparty could default on the transaction.

The smooth functioning of all these activities facilitates economic
growth in that lower costs and enterprise risks promote the production
of goods and services as well as employment. In this way the financial
system contributes to increased prosperity.

From: Willie.Mookie on
On Oct 9, 3:05 pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 10:18 am, Willie.Moo...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sounds like you have issues about money. Its impossible to make money
> > and not create value. That's what it means to make money.
>
> Have you never heard of Kevin Trudeau?
>
> > If you end
> > up with a lot of money in your pocket and have not created value, then
> > you are not a business person, you are a crook.
>
> Oh, never mind, you have heard of him.

Anecdotal reports of notable exceptions to the rule doesn't change the
rule. Given the low rate of capital formation and the high rate of
taxes, if any more than 1/2% of the total profits earned in business
were ill-gotten (and thereby subtracted from the economic engine,
perhaps with a multiplier if the subtraction involved huge destruction
of wealth) then the market would quickly collapse of its own weight.

Consider, the effect of Enron's accounting lies on the market and on
the economy as a whole. It had a huge impact for an extended period
of time. So, can't you see that if more than half a percent of the
wealth earned in the marketplace were ill gotten, that didn't truly
contribute to the creation of wealth generally, the whole system would
collapse.

This is the true cost of crime in places like the former Soviet Union
and other nations that are struggling with crime. Huge amounts of
cash flow through the Columbian economy due to the drug trade, and
flow through Afghanistan for the same reason. But is the Columbian or
Aghani economy a sterling example of wealth formation and progress?
No! They're all cluster fucks mired in poverty and violence.

True wealth comes from another source altogether - one that
understands the distinction between CREATING WEALTH and touching money
that doesn't stay in your hands.
..