From: Jonathan Morton on
"Yusuf B Gursey" <ybg(a)theworld.com> wrote in message
news:896542a4-e823-450a-8450-86d878949925(a)w31g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

>Easter is a moveable feast, meaning it is not fixed in relation to the
>civil calendar. The First Council of Nicaea (325) established the date
>of Easter as the first Sunday after the full moon (the Paschal Full
>Moon) following the vernal equinox.[3] Ecclesiastically, the equinox
>is reckoned to be on March 21 (regardless of the astronomically
>correct date), and the "Full Moon" is not necessarily the
>astronomically correct date. The date of Easter therefore varies
>between March 22 and April 25.

It does, but at present (certainly until 2199, at which point we move to a
new table) it is not capable of falling on 22 March. Of course we had 23
March in 2008 and there's a 24 April coming up next year.

Regards

Jonathan



From: Brian M. Scott on
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:38:08 +0000, Ant�nio Marques
<antonioprm(a)sapo.pt> wrote in
<news:hlmpb4$c42$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

[...]

> Chocolate bunnies and eggs, you can put them everywhere
> you like, but that's not Easter.

For me, growing up, that was exactly Easter. It was a minor
holiday, along with Thanksgiving and Hallowe'en; the major
holiday was Christmas.

Brian
From: Cheryl on
Andrew Usher wrote:
> On Feb 19, 3:07 pm, Ant�nio Marques <antonio...(a)sapo.pt> wrote:
>
>>>> The reason I fix Christmas to a Sunday has been my observation that
>>>> arranging a family Christmas is substantially more convenient when it
>>>> falls on a weekend than in the middle of the week. Given that Christmas
>>>> is the most important holiday in the year, should we not all get at
>>>> least a 3-day weekend, which we have for lesser holidays?
>>> Less than around 30% of the world population cares about Christmas or
>>> Easter or think that "Christmas is the most important holiday in the
>>> year".
>> Well, but for those who don't it doesn't really matter one way or the other
>> what day Christmas and Easter Sunday are, does it? So what relevance do they
>> have for you to bring them along? Or was it just the desire to sound clever?
>
> Right, and I figure that my calendar would be no worse than the
> present for those that don't.
>
> Indeed, I considered this problem purely as a logical one; as I've
> stated, I don't consider myself Christian, I adopted the Church
> calendar as a base only because it makes the problem more interesting.
>
> I didn't consider my calendar complete until I worked out my new leap
> year rule (Rule #3) - it not only ensures that both Christmas and
> Easter are within 7-day periods despite being a constant distance from
> each other and having leap day in between, it simultaneously causes
> there to be exactly 52 Sundays in every year if you take out Nov. 1
> which is All Saints' day; this immediately allows te to draw up a
> permanent list of the Sundays in the year with their traditional
> Christian designations, and then follow the perpetual calendar.
>
> And I moved the start of the week numbering to August from Nov. 1 so
> that the academic year and the US football season would be on the
> fixed schedule, and I think there can be no objection to that. The
> holidays I consider are Christmas and Easter (and of course the Church
> festivals fixed to them, but hardly anyone cares anymore), and US
> Thanksgiving - but other civil holidays could easily be fixed to the
> same if they are now observed on a Monday, say, or otherwise not fixed
> to a particular date.
>
> Andrew Usher

Which academic year are you considering? I can think of several
variations - K-12 vs universities and colleges, to begin with, and there
are even variations among the K-12 school years in different
jurisdictions - and even within the same one, in places where some
schools have a year-round schedule.

I will confess to being totally indifferent to the US football schedule.
In fact, I couldn't tell you what it is now, except for a vague
impression that it occurs in the fall, or possibly winter.

--
Cheryl
From: Androcles on

"Cheryl" <cperkins(a)mun.ca> wrote in message
news:7u8gk9FirvU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Andrew Usher wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 3:07 pm, Ant�nio Marques <antonio...(a)sapo.pt> wrote:
>>
>>>>> The reason I fix Christmas to a Sunday has been my observation that
>>>>> arranging a family Christmas is substantially more convenient when it
>>>>> falls on a weekend than in the middle of the week. Given that
>>>>> Christmas
>>>>> is the most important holiday in the year, should we not all get at
>>>>> least a 3-day weekend, which we have for lesser holidays?
>>>> Less than around 30% of the world population cares about Christmas or
>>>> Easter or think that "Christmas is the most important holiday in the
>>>> year".
>>> Well, but for those who don't it doesn't really matter one way or the
>>> other
>>> what day Christmas and Easter Sunday are, does it? So what relevance do
>>> they
>>> have for you to bring them along? Or was it just the desire to sound
>>> clever?
>>
>> Right, and I figure that my calendar would be no worse than the
>> present for those that don't.
>>
>> Indeed, I considered this problem purely as a logical one; as I've
>> stated, I don't consider myself Christian, I adopted the Church
>> calendar as a base only because it makes the problem more interesting.
>>
>> I didn't consider my calendar complete until I worked out my new leap
>> year rule (Rule #3) - it not only ensures that both Christmas and
>> Easter are within 7-day periods despite being a constant distance from
>> each other and having leap day in between, it simultaneously causes
>> there to be exactly 52 Sundays in every year if you take out Nov. 1
>> which is All Saints' day; this immediately allows te to draw up a
>> permanent list of the Sundays in the year with their traditional
>> Christian designations, and then follow the perpetual calendar.
>>
>> And I moved the start of the week numbering to August from Nov. 1 so
>> that the academic year and the US football season would be on the
>> fixed schedule, and I think there can be no objection to that. The
>> holidays I consider are Christmas and Easter (and of course the Church
>> festivals fixed to them, but hardly anyone cares anymore), and US
>> Thanksgiving - but other civil holidays could easily be fixed to the
>> same if they are now observed on a Monday, say, or otherwise not fixed
>> to a particular date.
>>
>> Andrew Usher
>
> Which academic year are you considering? I can think of several
> variations - K-12 vs universities and colleges, to begin with, and there
> are even variations among the K-12 school years in different
> jurisdictions - and even within the same one, in places where some schools
> have a year-round schedule.
>
> I will confess to being totally indifferent to the US football schedule.
> In fact, I couldn't tell you what it is now, except for a vague impression
> that it occurs in the fall, or possibly winter.
>
> --
> Cheryl

The USA doesn't have a football schedule. The rest of the world plays
football, the USA calls that soccer and then plays it's own version of
parochial handball.

From: jimp on
In sci.physics António Marques <antonioprm(a)sapo.pt> wrote:
> jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote (19-02-2010 19:21):
>> In sci.physics Andrew Usher<k_over_hbarc(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 19, 11:52 am, Halmyre<flashgordonreced...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> But, the whole point of Easter is that it has a full moon! You
>>>>> might as well scrap the whole thing otherwise. Or are you
>>>>> suggesting that we only take holidays at Easter every four years or
>>>>> so, when your “settled” date just happens to correspond with the
>>>>> right lunar phase?
>>>>
>>>> We don't have Christmas only when there's a bright star in the east.
>>>>
>>>> It's like saying "I was born on a Wednesday, so I'll only celebrate
>>>> my birthday when it falls on a Wednesday".
>>>
>>> The reason I fix Christmas to a Sunday has been my observation that
>>> arranging a family Christmas is substantially more convenient when it
>>> falls on a weekend than in the middle of the week. Given that Christmas
>>> is the most important holiday in the year, should we not all get at
>>> least a 3-day weekend, which we have for lesser holidays?
>>
>> Less than around 30% of the world population cares about Christmas or
>> Easter or think that "Christmas is the most important holiday in the
>> year".
>
> Well, but for those who don't it doesn't really matter one way or the other
> what day Christmas and Easter Sunday are, does it? So what relevance do they
> have for you to bring them along? Or was it just the desire to sound clever?

That a calendar serves a purpose beyond keeping track of regional, ethnic,
or religious "celebrations" of one small group.

And trying to come up with a new calendar fixating on Christmas is about
as logical as fixating on Waitangi Day.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.