From: Yusuf B Gursey on
On Feb 19, 5:07 pm, "Jonathan Morton"
<jonathan.mortonbutignorethisp...(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
> "Yusuf B Gursey" <y...(a)theworld.com> wrote in messagenews:896542a4-e823-450a-8450-86d878949925(a)w31g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> >Easter is a moveable feast, meaning it is not fixed in relation to the
> >civil calendar. The First Council of Nicaea (325) established the date
> >of Easter as the first Sunday after the full moon (the Paschal Full
> >Moon) following the vernal equinox.[3] Ecclesiastically, the equinox
> >is reckoned to be on March 21 (regardless of the astronomically
> >correct date), and the "Full Moon" is not necessarily the
> >astronomically correct date. The date of Easter therefore varies
> >between March 22 and April 25.
>
> It does, but at present (certainly until 2199, at which point we move to a
> new table) it is not capable of falling on 22 March. Of course we had 23
> March in 2008 and there's a 24 April coming up next year.
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan

BTW I didn't write the quoted text.
From: Bart Mathias on
James Hogg wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Andrew Usher
>
> Give the sound of your name, I suppose you would also renumber the
> years, with year 1 in what is now 4004 BC.

Another one goes right over my head. What in the world is special about
how "Andrew Usher" sounds?

Oh, never mind. I just googled "4004 BC."

Bart Mathias
From: jimp on
Andrew Usher <k_over_hbarc(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 4:56 pm, j...(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> > Well, but for those who don't it doesn't really matter one way or the other
>> > what day Christmas and Easter Sunday are, does it? So what relevance do they
>> > have for you to bring them along? Or was it just the desire to sound clever?
>>
>> That a calendar serves a purpose beyond keeping track of regional, ethnic,
>> or religious "celebrations" of one small group.
>
> It's hardly a small group, indeed perhaps larger than that for any
> other significant holiday in the world. And the Gregorian calendar
> that we use as already European-centered.

New Years (of various sorts) is celebrated by far more people than is
Christmas.

>> And trying to come up with a new calendar fixating on Christmas is about
>> as logical as fixating on Waitangi Day.
>
> This is just West-bashing.

You have something against New Zealand?

OK, Labor Day, also known in some places as May Day and International
Worker's Day.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: R H Draney on
Aatu Koskensilta filted:
>
>"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
> - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Dog Latin translation: "That man can't speak, but he sure can swing!"

.....r


--
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?
From: R H Draney on
Peter T. Daniels filted:
>
>On Feb 19, 1:02=A0pm, Cheryl <cperk...(a)mun.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I want an official long holiday weekend in every single month, no
>> exceptions.
>
>I thought they should have used MLK Day to commemorate the March on
>Washington, rather than his birthday, since there are no holidays in
>August.

I always thought it should be observed on the anniversary of his assassination,
so I could get my birthday off every year....

I also plumped for rolling back "Presidents' Day" to the original "Washington's
Birthday" and "Lincoln's Birthday", further suggesting that *every* president's
birthday should be a holiday...(Polk and Harding screwed things up by having
their birthdays on the same day of the year)...as luck would have it, at the
time I made this suggestion, that still would have left us with no holidays in
June (Bush Sr came along a year or two later)....r


--
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty.
An optometrist asks whether you see the glass
more full like this?...or like this?