From: Peter Ceresole on
Phil Taylor <nothere(a)all.invalid> wrote:

> How could you tell? By your own figures the difference is about 30 nM.
> I really doubt that any measuring instrument used by a builder could
> demonstrate that sort of accuracy.

Listen, mate, it all adds up, dunnit? Oh, and cash would be nice,
thanks...
--
Peter
From: Pd on
Phil Taylor <nothere(a)all.invalid> wrote:

> In article <1jfyex7.nf1nxnmzroyN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>, Pd
> <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > I'd be willing to bet money that somebody in India right *now* is using
> > a measuring stick/tape/pigeon marked out in Indian inches to mark out a
> > plot for building.
>
> How could you tell? By your own figures the difference is about 30 nM.
> I really doubt that any measuring instrument used by a builder could
> demonstrate that sort of accuracy.

Because their Ganymede lander would miss its target by over a thousand
kilometres.

--
Pd
From: T i m on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:52:27 +0100, nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder) wrote:


>> Is this still the recovery plan do you know?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUy0laGmLTQ&feature=related
>
>That's the idea.

Quite a feat if they pull it off.

>Parliament still has to approve though.

K. Would it make it more complicated (politically sensitive) seeing
how many lives were lost etc? War grave?
>
>> I like the way the 'soft jaws' extend from the grab when picking up
>> the sub (I was thinking as the grab came over the sub "what stops the
>> grab damaging the sub and potentially making matters worse". ;-)
>>
>> At the end when the first half goes into the storage unit, what
>> happens to it next (or is that the end, entombment)?
>
>Both halves are to be salvaged. That's what the other shed is for.

Understood but I was asking if you knew what they would do with
it/them once in the shed(s)? I mean. if they had the idea of burying
them with sand, will they just entomb them in concrete in the shed(s)
or is there stuff to salvage (torpedoes / mercury etc)? Or would they
be suitable archive material?
>
>> What's your involvement in all of this if you don't mind me asking
>> Jan?
>
>Just curious,

Ah ok but what about the tyres and pressures you mentioned?

Cheers, T i m

From: T i m on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:24:24 +0000, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd)
wrote:

>Phil Taylor <nothere(a)all.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In article <1jfyex7.nf1nxnmzroyN%peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid>, Pd
>> <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> > I'd be willing to bet money that somebody in India right *now* is using
>> > a measuring stick/tape/pigeon marked out in Indian inches to mark out a
>> > plot for building.
>>
>> How could you tell? By your own figures the difference is about 30 nM.
>> I really doubt that any measuring instrument used by a builder could
>> demonstrate that sort of accuracy.
>
>Because their Ganymede lander would miss its target by over a thousand
>kilometres.

And a miss is a good as 1609.344 meters ...

All I wanted was a 9" pianist. ;-(

T i m
From: T i m on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:14:41 +0000, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd)
wrote:


>I'd be willing to bet money that somebody in India right *now* is using
>a measuring stick/tape/pigeon marked out in Indian inches to mark out a
>plot for building.


We were considering a 'computer desk' being offered on Freecycle and
the offerer didn't have a rule, so just kept saying stuff like "Std
Office size" when we asked for even rough sizes.

If it wasn't for the fact it was very local, she needed it out quickly
and the dump was on our way home we went and got it unmeasured.

Even '4.5 lengths of A4 paper long by 3 high' would have given us a
pretty good idea what to expect.

T i m