Prev: unable to install Skype
Next: UPS / SLES 10 question
From: DenverD on 12 Nov 2009 10:13 > The fastest I saw a PC with windows go was 9.8m/s^2 only because you didn't use the newer and obviously more powerful M$-Superb Professional Enterprise Ultimate Supreme Gravity 2010 Sneak Preview Closed VIP Beta Anti-Classic Plus X12 -- DenverD (Linux Counter 282315) via Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (20090817), KDE 3.5.7 "release 72-11", openSUSE Linux 10.3, 2.6.22.19-0.4-default #1 SMP i686 athlon
From: Kevin Nathan on 12 Nov 2009 11:25 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:13:40 +0100 DenverD <spam.trap(a)SOMEwhere.dk> wrote: >> The fastest I saw a PC with windows go was 9.8m/s^2 > >only because you didn't use the newer and obviously more powerful >M$-Superb Professional Enterprise Ultimate Supreme Gravity 2010 Sneak >Preview Closed VIP Beta Anti-Classic Plus X12 > Well, *I* did and the results were disappointing, until you took into account it was a Microsoft product: 7.3 m/s :-) -- Kevin Nathan (Arizona, USA) Linux Potpourri and a.o.l.s. FAQ -- (temporarily offline) Open standards. Open source. Open minds. The command line is the front line. Linux 2.6.25.20-0.5-pae 9:24am up 21 days 23:38, 38 users, load average: 0.48, 0.71, 0.87
From: wolfgang kern on 12 Nov 2009 15:27 "houghi" figured: > > The fastest I saw a PC with windows go was 9.8m/s^2 That seem to were a situation when the PC crossed the desc border and going to hit the floor ... :) __ wolfgang
From: Thomas on 12 Nov 2009 18:21 houghi wrote: > Kevin Nathan wrote: >> My older brother has been running Vista starting with 2GB RAM. He was >> having various problems (he actually calls Microsoft Support!) and the >> solution to at least one of the problems (an MS update not running to >> completion) was an increase to 4GB RAM at MS's suggestion. That fixed >> it and now he's pissed because the system doesn't ever get to even 2GB. >> Amazing lack of software engineering on Microsoft's part... :-) > > The fastest I saw a PC with windows go was 9.8m/s^2 > > houghi You owe me a keyboard, houghi. (And a half a cup of coffee.) Thomas
From: Darrell Stec on 12 Nov 2009 19:27
Martin inscribed forevermore utilizing silicon chips:: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:22:40 -0500, Darrell Stec <darstec(a)neo.rr.com> > wrote: > > >>That does not seem to be much of a solution unless I am missing something. >>Besides my system only has 1 GB RAM which is minimum for WinXP > > Hardly, WinXP runs adequately on my PC with 3/4 of that. How many different computers do you use in one day? Adequately is relative. Maybe you are use to slower performance or do not use memory intensive applications. -- Later, Darrell |