From: Darrell Stec on
Martin inscribed forevermore utilizing silicon chips::

> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:27:39 -0500, Darrell Stec <darstec(a)neo.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Martin inscribed forevermore utilizing silicon chips::
>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:22:40 -0500, Darrell Stec <darstec(a)neo.rr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That does not seem to be much of a solution unless I am missing
>>>>something. Besides my system only has 1 GB RAM which is minimum for
>>>>WinXP
>>>
>>> Hardly, WinXP runs adequately on my PC with 3/4 of that.
>>
>>How many different computers do you use in one day? Adequately is
>>relative. Maybe you are use to slower performance or do not use memory
>>intensive applications.
>
> Applications run as fast as on the other PC that runs Linux.

Once again -- FAST is relative.

You didn't mention how many different computers you use in a day. What
seems fast to you might be painfully slow to others and especially to me
because I've worked with clients who might have 40,000 or more computers in
the company with varying hardware configuration.

Furthermore you forgot to mention what applications you are talking about,
how many simultaneously and how memory intensive. All of these things can
affect how your computer runs.

I know for an absolute fact based on the sheer number of client's computers
I've troubleshot that an absolute minimum of 1 GB for WinXP and 2 GB for
Vista (aka Windows 7) solves a myriad of problems, the least of which is
file corruption.

Let me ask you a question. How many Level 7 or level 9 technicians from
Microsoft have you had to call over the last 20 years? I doubt even one.

Are you a technician in the field or even a designer? Or are you as I
suspect an end user judging from his experience of less than 10 or 20
computers personally?

--
Later,
Darrell
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: unable to install Skype
Next: UPS / SLES 10 question