From: R on 3 Mar 2010 03:30 Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Oh sure, it certainly can as I use it in Safari 4.0.4. My question > really was about whether webkit dependent content, like HTML5, would run > on many existing browsers, and it looks as though it will, with however > the rather important exception of IE and Firefox. Firefox does support HTML5: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.6b3/releasenotes/ "Support for new CSS, DOM and HTML5 web technologies." What Firefox does not support is H.264 content referenced using the HTML5 <video> element. The not so widely used Ogg Theora will be supported instead.
From: Peter Ceresole on 3 Mar 2010 03:59 R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote: > http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.6b3/releasenotes/ > > "Support for new CSS, DOM and HTML5 web technologies." > > What Firefox does not support is H.264 content referenced > using the HTML5 <video> element. The not so widely used > Ogg Theora will be supported instead. Okay. When that happens (I'm on 3.6 right now, can't find the bets download link) will it let me view the HTML5 beta on Youtube, which it won't right now, or is this going to be an incompatibility? I've read that Mozilla don't want to use H.264 because of a rights issue. -- Peter
From: Sara on 3 Mar 2010 05:04 In article <1jeqxr8.11vtl1mnd9l8wN%usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk>, usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody) wrote: > Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > > > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > To the best of my knowledge I've only ever once run into a situation > > > > where > > > > Fairplay prevented me from playing something, and that was because I'd > > > > somehow authorised five computers. > > > > > > > > Still not entirely sure how I did that. Easy enough fix though. > > > > > > It is. You could use harmony and strip out the DRM. > > > > In my case I just deathorised all machines and re-did them. I think I > > added a Windows machine at some point that I no longer had access to > > (owing to it now running a completely different OS) otherwise I'd have > > just deauthorised the rogue machine. > > I just had one album protected, but the fact it cause me a problem once > was too much, so I unlocked it. The biggest pain I found was if you'd forgotten (every single time!) to unauthorise a machine before wiping it setting up a new one. -- Sara Wishing the weather would cheer up
From: Chris Ridd on 3 Mar 2010 05:17 On 2010-03-03 10:04:18 +0000, Sara said: > The biggest pain I found was if you'd forgotten (every single time!) to > unauthorise a machine before wiping it setting up a new one. Yes, me too. It would be nice if you could individually deauthorize other machines inside iTunes. -- Chris
From: Woody on 3 Mar 2010 05:32
Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote: > On 2010-03-03 10:04:18 +0000, Sara said: > > > The biggest pain I found was if you'd forgotten (every single time!) to > > unauthorise a machine before wiping it setting up a new one. > > Yes, me too. It would be nice if you could individually deauthorize > other machines inside iTunes. I had that. You can just deauthorise all your machines, and then add them again, and you can only do it once a year. It was too much of a faff to me, so I unlocked the files. -- Woody |