painful to watch
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: AT&T ends Unlimited Data on iPhone and iPad, will allow iPhone tethering for $20 a month.
Next: NEWS: Intel preps x86 Android for summer release
From: Todd Allcock on 23 Jul 2010 01:51 At 23 Jul 2010 03:18:45 +0000 Larry wrote: > Todd Allcock <elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote in news:ea72o.1$EJ7.0 > @hurricane: > > > True- both those are in the "Pro" paid service. I just have a heck of a > > time remoting in via cellular from some reason. (RDM works great at home > > on my own network via WiFi where I don't need it to!) ;) > > > > > > Todd, have you tried switching from the standard VNC ports to some oddball > port the sellphone carriers don't have throttled to prevent the service? No- but my cell service has all ports open AFAIK. T-Mo stopped port blocking a few years ago. I can't get in from open WiFi either- only my own network. I've opened the port on my router's firewall (I think- this POS "Actiontec" combo DSL modem/WiFi router Qwest issues has nasty counter- intuitive software. Several content servers that worked fine on my last router don't work consistently with this one. I've only had this thing a month, so I haven't had time to mess with it much.) > Remote desktop even runs faster on non standard ports through free wifi > because of the port throttling going on to lower bandwidth usage. Part of my problem, probably, is the WinMo RD clent. There's no option to change ports, and I'm not actually sure it resolves names, though it's supposed to. Entering the computer's name when on network doesn't work, but entering it's IP address does. To connect remotely I enter the web address issued by my dynamic DNS redirector service- maybe I need to enter the numeric address directly.
From: Roger 2008 on 23 Jul 2010 16:38 "John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message news:544i46999jbons59jrefra8qr7i3gvdat7(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:29:46 -0600, in > <EqednSVitrjyKtXRnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" > <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: > > >"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message > >news:693e46pqfd6vv5s42ak4k8dmqhgd90vo09(a)4ax.com... > >> > >> Multi-boot Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows XP Professional, Linux. > > > >Good choice. > > > >> >Me, I like the operating > >> >systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone so > >that > >> >throws out the cheap version of XP, the cheap version of Vista and the > >cheap > >> >version of Windows 7. > >> > >> VNC works on all of them. > >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing> > > > >Are you telling me you can access your computer from your phone if all you > >have is VNC on your computer? > > > >I certainly didn't see anything about that on the URL you listed above. > >Plus I have tried to get TSWeb to work from my mobile phone and it failed so > >I don't expect VNC to work either. > >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771908(WS.10).aspx > > > I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my mobile. Works quite nicely. I used TSWeb on a netbook tethered to my mobile and it worked quite nicely but I like things I use from my phone itself without having to tether anything to it. But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work with one specific Host Header Name.
From: alexd on 23 Jul 2010 16:08 Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, Todd Allcock chose the tried and tested strategy of: > dropping mobile support altogether! Thanks, MS!) Quite a nice summary of MS's mobile strategy. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx) 21:04:51 up 5 days, 11:35, 4 users, load average: 0.04, 0.34, 0.33 Qua illic est accuso, illic est a vindicatum
From: John Navas on 23 Jul 2010 17:16 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in <yMydnXmwXJl4c9TRnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work >with one specific Host Header Name. Not sure what you mean by that? -- John "We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo
From: Roger 2008 on 23 Jul 2010 19:22
"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message news:jk1k461ihgu9rcg5hrjv637ndi1err7mlq(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in > <yMydnXmwXJl4c9TRnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" > <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: > > >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to > >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work > >with one specific Host Header Name. > > Not sure what you mean by that? TSWeb is a part of IIS so the following might help explain what a Host Header Name is: "How To Use Host Header Names to Configure Multiple Web Sites in Internet Information Services 5.0" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163 Since you have XP Pro then you have everything you need right now to test out TSWeb. I even know someone that can help you setup TSWeb. :-) Years ago when I messed with VNC all you had to do to get to the name/password prompt was use an IP address with a port number. If it is still like that then I'm still not interested in it. BTW can we drop alt.cellular.cingular and alt.internet.wireless from this thread? TIA |