painful to watch
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: AT&T ends Unlimited Data on iPhone and iPad, will allow iPhone tethering for $20 a month.
Next: NEWS: Intel preps x86 Android for summer release
From: John Navas on 23 Jul 2010 19:09 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in <LuudnUT47I_AiNfRnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: >"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message >news:jk1k461ihgu9rcg5hrjv637ndi1err7mlq(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in >> <yMydnXmwXJl4c9TRnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" >> <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: >> >> >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to >> >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work >> >with one specific Host Header Name. >> >> Not sure what you mean by that? > >TSWeb is a part of IIS so the following might help explain what a Host >Header Name is: > >"How To Use Host Header Names to Configure Multiple Web Sites in Internet >Information Services 5.0" >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163 I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the goalposts ;) it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but I'm still not clear what it is. -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern�s Law of Suspended Judgement]
From: Roger 2008 on 23 Jul 2010 21:30 "John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message news:4j7k46p483hucm2369e8pfba932f4ksd7c(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in > > I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit > usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're > trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and > since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote > desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the > goalposts ;) it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but > I'm still not clear what it is. Here is my quote: "I like the operating systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone" Then you started posting about VNC and I couldn't see how I could use VNC with "my phone" so I searched the internet and found I'd need a VNC viewer. Then you posted something about:"I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my mobile." Then I decided if you were going to talk about tethered to your mobile I'd mention how well TSWeb works when you tether a netbook to your mobile. Then while you were posting about VNC I decided to find out if anything changed in VNC since I messed with it years ago. Looks like TSWeb still has VNC beat in certain areas. ---------------------------- BTW since TSWeb is a web interface for Remote Desktop you can read more about TSWeb vs VNC at: VNC vs. pcAnywhere vs. Remote Desktop http://www.devhood.com/messages/message_view-2.aspx?thread_id=16008
From: John Navas on 23 Jul 2010 20:32 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:30:23 -0600, in <fPydnWrOtKbcrtfRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, "Roger 2008" <rwpcs(a)att.net> wrote: > >"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message >news:4j7k46p483hucm2369e8pfba932f4ksd7c(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in >> >> I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit >> usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're >> trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and >> since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote >> desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the >> goalposts ;) it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but >> I'm still not clear what it is. > >Here is my quote: >"I like the operating systems where I can easily enable remote access to use >with my phone" > >Then you started posting about VNC and I couldn't see how I could use VNC >with "my phone" so I searched the internet and found I'd need a VNC viewer. > >Then you posted something about:"I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my >mobile." Then I decided if you were going to talk about tethered to your >mobile I'd mention how well TSWeb works when you tether a netbook to your >mobile. > >Then while you were posting about VNC I decided to find out if anything >changed in VNC since I messed with it years ago. Looks like TSWeb still has >VNC beat in certain areas. > >---------------------------- > >BTW since TSWeb is a web interface for Remote Desktop you can read more >about TSWeb vs VNC at: > >VNC vs. pcAnywhere vs. Remote Desktop >http://www.devhood.com/messages/message_view-2.aspx?thread_id=16008 > Still not clear. Must be dense. Sorry. -- John "We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo
From: Roger 2008 on 23 Jul 2010 21:57 "John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message news:b3dk469ke45t4ge9lb9q4sun48hf36obd3(a)4ax.com... > > Still not clear. Must be dense. Sorry. TSWeb and VNC are a lot alike. The both give you remote access via a browser. Maybe VNC works better since you use linux but TSWeb works great for me. BTW once you have TSWeb setup on XP Pro the way you access it is simply by going to hostheadername/tsweb.
From: Larry on 23 Jul 2010 21:11
Todd Allcock <elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote in news:4Va2o.27152 $xZ2.1841(a)newsfe07.iad: > At 23 Jul 2010 03:18:45 +0000 Larry wrote: >> Todd Allcock <elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote in news:ea72o.1$EJ7.0 >> @hurricane: >> >> > True- both those are in the "Pro" paid service. I just have a heck > of a >> > time remoting in via cellular from some reason. (RDM works great at > home >> > on my own network via WiFi where I don't need it to!) ;) >> > >> > >> >> Todd, have you tried switching from the standard VNC ports to some > oddball >> port the sellphone carriers don't have throttled to prevent the service? > > No- but my cell service has all ports open AFAIK. T-Mo stopped port > blocking a few years ago. I can't get in from open WiFi either- only my > own network. > > I've opened the port on my router's firewall (I think- this POS > "Actiontec" combo DSL modem/WiFi router Qwest issues has nasty counter- > intuitive software. Several content servers that worked fine on my last > router don't work consistently with this one. I've only had this thing a > month, so I haven't had time to mess with it much.) > >> Remote desktop even runs faster on non standard ports through free wifi >> because of the port throttling going on to lower bandwidth usage. > > Part of my problem, probably, is the WinMo RD clent. There's no option > to change ports, and I'm not actually sure it resolves names, though it's > supposed to. Entering the computer's name when on network doesn't work, > but entering it's IP address does. To connect remotely I enter the web > address issued by my dynamic DNS redirector service- maybe I need to > enter the numeric address directly. > > It would be interesting to plug a PC running a port logger directly into the main port of the DSL modem, then attack it with a port scanner from some IP OFF the DSL company's system to see how many ports you could actually call and/or ping from the attack computer. If you never saw a connection attempt on port XXXX, you'd have evidence of port blocking many of them are doing. -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry |