2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
in [Physics]
|
Prev: NASA to Earth: Global Warming Is for Real, Folks!
Next: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
From: Sam Wormley on 26 Feb 2010 09:59 On 2/26/10 5:17 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009: Second warmest year on record > > What record? > > What makes a year important within a cherrypicked slope and within a > flyspeck of time compared to hundreds of bigger ups and downs during the last > 12000 years of interglacial? > > <AGW mode> Shrill... SHRILL ... S H R I L L !!!!!!111oneeleven</> Since the have been many "ups and downs" over the last 12000 years why are you so surprised that we are experiencing another up?
From: AM on 26 Feb 2010 10:10 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 2/26/10 5:17 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2009: Second warmest year on record >> >> What record? >> >> What makes a year important within a cherrypicked slope and within a >> flyspeck of time compared to hundreds of bigger ups and downs during >> the last >> 12000 years of interglacial? >> >> <AGW mode> Shrill... SHRILL ... S H R I L L !!!!!!111oneeleven</> > > Since the have been many "ups and downs" over the last > 12000 years why are you so surprised that we are experiencing > another up? > > Than why is it a problem ? -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net http://www.novac.com
From: Sam Wormley on 26 Feb 2010 10:26 On 2/26/10 9:10 AM, AM wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 2/26/10 5:17 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >>> Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 2009: Second warmest year on record >>> >>> What record? >>> >>> What makes a year important within a cherrypicked slope and within a >>> flyspeck of time compared to hundreds of bigger ups and downs during >>> the last >>> 12000 years of interglacial? >>> >>> <AGW mode> Shrill... SHRILL ... S H R I L L !!!!!!111oneeleven</> >> >> Since the have been many "ups and downs" over the last >> 12000 years why are you so surprised that we are experiencing >> another up? >> > > Than why is it a problem ? > Whether one considers global climate change as a problem is perspective dependent. CLEANTECHNICA: NASA to Earth: Global Warming Is for Real, Folks! NASA is putting its two cents into the global warming conversation with a new Web site that details the climate change phenomenon, including videos, articles and a huge archive of images http://cl.exct.net/?qs=bb493ab0c40160cae3dcdd3f65e9769a9e5d4b1c53f56c4f6b30056f712da911
From: Earl Evleth on 26 Feb 2010 11:14 On 26/02/10 15:59, in article U9idnXQw5sQnfBrWnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com, "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Since the have been many "ups and downs" over the last > 12000 years why are you so surprised that we are experiencing > another up? This one exceeds any in the past 12,000 years. Trotting along after the increase in CO2!
From: Chris L Peterson on 26 Feb 2010 13:37
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:34:39 -0800 (PST), JohnM <john_howard_morgan(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >Nevertheless, there are very many out there who deny the global >temperature and therefore global climate has changed in the last 100 >years. You may or may not be one of them for all I know. My questions, >at least the ones you saw fir to answer rather than to snip, asked >about how those who disputed no change vs change (both sides) would >respond if the contrary state were shown to have existed. Unfortunately, you are asking this of someone who has neither the education nor the wits to respond intelligently. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |