2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
in [Physics]
|
Prev: NASA to Earth: Global Warming Is for Real, Folks!
Next: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
From: Sam Wormley on 28 Feb 2010 11:56 On 2/28/10 10:43 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > CO2 was always at about an average of 330 +/-40 ppmv > over the last 400000 years. Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResImages/1-Global-pg-13.jpg http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm
From: Sam Wormley on 28 Feb 2010 12:08 On 2/28/10 10:57 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Drastic Climate Change Affects Germany >> http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,1726287,00.html >> >> Germany in Top Five Countries Fighting Climate Change >> http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,2239196,00.html >> >> Climate Change in Germany >> http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-k/k2974.pdf >> >> Germany Climate Change Profile >> Part 2: Fact Sheet >> >> http://knowledge.allianz.com/en/globalissues/climate_profiles/climate_germany/climate_profile_germany_facts.html > > Germany is not the globe. Very astute, Peter. However, did you notice that Germans are not denying the global climate change that is taking place?
From: Sam Wormley on 28 Feb 2010 12:15 On 2/28/10 11:06 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2/28/10 10:43 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >>> CO2 was always at about an average of 330 +/-40 ppmv >>> over the last 400000 years. >> >> Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 >> http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResImages/1-Global-pg-13.jpg >> http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm > > You have air bubbles in an 2008 ice core? > There are no air bubbles in ice cores until about 2100 years before present. > > And air bubbles also in an 2100 ice core? > > Wow! You must be dreaming at lightspeed! > Caution! Step aside! > Sam Wormley is tunneling again! Peter, you stated that "CO2 was always at about an average of 330 +/-40 ppmv over the last 400000 years". That appears to be in contradiction to data showing CO2 remaining below 300 ppmv for the last 400000 year and in fact 800000 years. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm http://www.globalchange.gov/HighResImages/1-Global-pg-13.jpg
From: Sam Wormley on 28 Feb 2010 12:19 On 2/28/10 10:54 AM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Why don't you show us the paper with the evidence of a long-term T to CO2 > correlation? Scientific Evidence: Increasing Temperatures & Greenhouse Gases > http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/scientific_evidence.htm CLEANTECHNICA: NASA to Earth: Global Warming Is for Real, Folks! NASA is putting its two cents into the global warming conversation with a new Web site that details the climate change phenomenon, including videos, articles and a huge archive of images http://cl.exct.net/?qs=bb493ab0c40160cae3dcdd3f65e9769a9e5d4b1c53f56c4f6b30056f712da911 Climate Change: Follow The Money Not that money is equivalent to truth, but sometimes it can be an indication of motives. It�s no accident that oil money is behind organizations like the Southeastern Legal Foundation, which is challenging the U.S. EPA on greenhouse gas emissions, to say nothing of Exxon�s history of involvement in climate denialism. Contrast that to the U.S. Department of Defense, which just issued a Quadrennial Defense Review assessing threats to national security that basically put the entire U.S. military on global warming alert. So, follow the money: some companies are betting against global warming (and therefore against our national security if you believe the DoD), but a growing list of other companies are putting their money behind NASA and the DoD by supporting climate legislation and engaging in national sustainability initiatives. See: http://cl.exct.net/?qs=bb493ab0c40160cae3dcdd3f65e9769a9e5d4b1c53f56c4f6b30056f712da911
From: OG on 28 Feb 2010 12:28
"Peter Muehlbauer" <spamtrap.AT(a)AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote in message news:m4jko5t9ebv87sj4hqrtl0m8a3ibne6e32(a)nntp.frankenexpress.de... > "OG" <owen(a)gwynnefamily.org.uk> wrote: > >> >> "Peter Muehlbauer" <spamtrap.AT(a)AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote in message >> news:66efo5hcv2kdj23uhnnn9f1te1b00ounsn(a)nntp.frankenexpress.de... >> > Tom P <werotizy(a)freent.dd> wrote: >> > >> >> Peter Muehlbauer wrote: >> >> > Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> 2009: Second warmest year on record >> >> > >> >> > What record? >> >> > >> >> > What makes a year important within a cherrypicked slope and within a >> >> > flyspeck of time compared to hundreds of bigger ups and downs during >> >> > the last >> >> > 12000 years of interglacial? >> >> > >> >> > <AGW mode> Shrill... SHRILL ... S H R I L L !!!!!!111oneeleven </> >> >> >> >> Translation - the mill farmer can't think of anything to say. >> > >> > Translation: >> > If you stand convicted and can't refute a word, start attacking the >> > author. >> >> Do you have evidence for a bigger up? You claim 'bigger ups and downs', >> do >> you have evidence? > > Of course. > If you'd have read along here, you'd know. > > http://sceptics.umweltluege.de/vostok/vtrendz.png Global? |