Prev: Relativistic "Doppler" shift, and why bp hates cap&trade derivatives [*], if they do.
Next: Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion, and whether Murdoch/bp hate Captain Tax derivatives [*], re "climategate controversy."
From: mpc755 on 6 Aug 2010 15:48 On Aug 6, 2:49 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > you are about as exciting of a coreespondent as dishwater, but > darkmatter is just more effluvia of Einsteinmania, > reifying his bit of math about gravity, > ignoring the 99.99% of Universe that is plasma ... well, > maybe a tenth, because a recent discovery is that > dihyrdgen is much-more common than ionic hydrgen. but, > you see, no vacuum for your theory to be employed in. > > you can ignore Kaluza's "stringtheory," if you like, but > it wasn't him who used the metaphor, and the math still works, > apparently (I'm not so good at that, either .-) > > > You're the one who is supposedly trying to relate gravity with > > magnetism and electricity. They relate through dark matter > > thus: > Al Gore: The Modern Cecil Rhodes > In fact, when you look at it, you find out that companies that were > founded in the tradition of Cecil Rhodes, are today heavily involved > in weapons deals that certainly involve South Africa. And here we > actually get a picture of the continued function of the policy of the > British East India Company, the old colonizing policy, the role of the > British Empire as it was founded more than 200 years ago.http://www.larouchepub.com/lym/2007/3435lym_africa.html > > thus: I agree, but he did start out with a good observation, iff and > iff only because I made it, two, a long, long, long time, > ago ... er, got it from Bucky!... so, how do you say that > "counting is dimensional?..." do androids dream of dimensional sheep? > > --les ducs d'oil!http://tarpley.net > > --Light, A History!http://wlym.com Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? Why won't you answer such a simple question? 'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter' http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html "Astronomers using NASAs Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water." The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate. A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and enters and exits a single slit. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters and exits multiple slits. The dark matter displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference. Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. Dark matter is displaced by matter. Dark matter is not at rest when displaced. Dark matter displaced by matter exerts pressure towards the matter. Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity. Maxwell's displacement current is dark matter displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring dark matter and matter is energy. Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 6 Aug 2010 15:50 On Aug 6, 3:23 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Please keep account of the quantity of claims that you make. > > Mitch Raemsch A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and enters and exits a single slit. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters and exits multiple slits. The dark matter displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference. Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. Dark matter is displaced by matter. Dark matter is not at rest when displaced. Dark matter displaced by matter exerts pressure towards the matter. Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity. Maxwell's displacement current is dark matter displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring dark matter and matter is energy. Mass is conserved.
From: PD on 6 Aug 2010 17:08 On Aug 6, 2:47 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 2:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 6, 9:49 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 6, 10:41 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Henri, Mike Cavedon is tired of replying to himself, and so he's > > > > > > > > baiting anybody who will bite. His only regular conversation partner > > > > > > > > is a homeless guy who thinks he won two Nobel Prizes last year. > > > > > > > > You have never answered if the ripple reaches the Earth and if not > > > > > > > then why not? > > > > > > > And I've told you the reason why I don't answer your questions. Do you > > > > > > remember the reason? Does it make sense to you? > > > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > > > > > I've already told you why I don't give YOU an answer to this simple > > > > question. Why can you not remember or absorb that simple reason? > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > > > Well, it's plain you cannot absorb the simple reason you aren't given > > answers. > > And so your only recourse is to repeat your question, which of course > > further exacerbates the reason you aren't given answers. > > > Einstein did have an insight about this that you can quote, since > > you're fond of quoting him: > > "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting > > different results." > > > PD > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > Sorry, I don't answer even simple questions for people who are obviously insane.
From: mpc755 on 6 Aug 2010 20:55 On Aug 6, 5:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 2:47 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 6, 2:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 6, 9:49 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 6, 10:41 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Henri, Mike Cavedon is tired of replying to himself, and so he's > > > > > > > > > baiting anybody who will bite. His only regular conversation partner > > > > > > > > > is a homeless guy who thinks he won two Nobel Prizes last year. > > > > > > > > > You have never answered if the ripple reaches the Earth and if not > > > > > > > > then why not? > > > > > > > > And I've told you the reason why I don't answer your questions. Do you > > > > > > > remember the reason? Does it make sense to you? > > > > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > > > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > > > > > > I've already told you why I don't give YOU an answer to this simple > > > > > question. Why can you not remember or absorb that simple reason? > > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > > > > Well, it's plain you cannot absorb the simple reason you aren't given > > > answers. > > > And so your only recourse is to repeat your question, which of course > > > further exacerbates the reason you aren't given answers. > > > > Einstein did have an insight about this that you can quote, since > > > you're fond of quoting him: > > > "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting > > > different results." > > > > PD > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question? > > Sorry, I don't answer even simple questions for people who are > obviously insane. Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not? Why won't you answer such a simple question? 'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter' http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html "Astronomers using NASAs Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water." The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate. A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and enters and exits a single slit. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters and exits multiple slits. The dark matter displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference. Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. Dark matter is displaced by matter. Dark matter is not at rest when displaced. Dark matter displaced by matter exerts pressure towards the matter. Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity. Maxwell's displacement current is dark matter displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring dark matter and matter is energy. Mass is conserved.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 7 Aug 2010 18:07 On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:00:25 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:36:26 -0700 (PDT), "nuny(a)bid.nes" >> <alien8752(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On Aug 4, 3:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>> >>>> SPACE CARRYING A FIELD IS NOT THE SAME AS SPACE DEVOID OF FIELDS. >>> >>> There is no place in the Universe "devoid of fields". >> >> The WFT says that fields are quantized and the inverse square law must >> eventually break down. The starts to occur at the WDT (Wilson Density >> Threshold) and genuine holes of 'nothing' form momentarily in space...like >> foam plastic. The lower the density, the bigger the holes..(Note: density >> involves fields as well as ordinary matter) >> >> Below the WDT light behaves 100% ballistically in the holes. It is very >> close to being that in a high vacuum anyway. > >Given that there are no observations supporting ballistic theory, I can't >help but wonder where this inside information comes from. Every known experiment support BaTh. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Prev: Relativistic "Doppler" shift, and why bp hates cap&trade derivatives [*], if they do. Next: Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion, and whether Murdoch/bp hate Captain Tax derivatives [*], re "climategate controversy." |