Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:45 RogerN prays you hit no trees.. :P
From: John Fields on 2 Apr 2010 15:57 On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:29:49 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <l8sbr55jb9i7009ob8eg1di37f10va18do(a)4ax.com>, >jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:42:00 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <qqhar5h75vlclgnjo91v0kjdjs28fnope4(a)4ax.com>, spam(a)spam.com >> >says... >> >> >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:22:09 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >But do you have the balls to tell me what religion Larkin is in? >> >> >> >> Why the obsession with what religion the man is? Did it ever occur to >> >> you it's none of your business. >> >> >> >> Your getting pretty fucked-up. Take a couple of valium and call it a >> >> night. >> > >> >Yup.. >> >I'm just waiting for Larkin to write that his religion is none of my >> >business.. >> >> --- >> Since it should be clear to even the least intellectually gifted that >> Larkin's spiritual leanings really _are_ no concern of yours, what's >> left is that you're merely trolling in order to get a response from him. >> >> Sad, really... >> >> JF > >Yes.. It's my aim to get a response. The more difficult it is, the >stronger the data point. --- Nonsense. The more difficult it is,[to get a response] the less likely it is that someone wants to play your silly little game. JF
From: John Fields on 2 Apr 2010 16:01 On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:31:00 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <d2tbr5lnp7aondg4bkpgptm9u96g1gfj40(a)4ax.com>, >jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:40:50 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <4llar5p9f943cv0rt0jjfn90avjo5utqb2(a)4ax.com>, >> >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... >> >> >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >The bible would certainly be of interest if physics,chemisty and biology >> >> >books quoted the bible on gravity theory, atomic theory and genetics. >> >> > >> >> >Those mid east bronze age bible writing desert monkeys didn't even know >> >> >they were breathing nitrogen. >> >> >> >> >> >> Whouda thunk that all those times I called you an idiot that it was >> >> actually spot on!? >> > >> >Maybe you can help me out and explain what you found wrong in my post. >> >> --- >> The Bible is certainly of interest, but it isn't a science book. >> >> Consequently, references to gravity theory, atomic theory and genetics >> won't be found there, and your denigration of its authors as well as the >> book itself is disingenuous. >> >> JF > >Thank you making the point that the bible isn't a science book.. --- Well, someone had to in order to point out and, therefore, end your delusion. You're welcome, in any case. JF
From: RogerN on 2 Apr 2010 16:10 "John Tserkezis" <jt(a)techniciansyndrome.org.invalid> wrote in message news:4bb5adbd$0$5591$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... > Jon Kirwan wrote: > >> Well, there are other points. Such as whether or not it >> qualifies as 'dishonest' for Rigol to sit mum while selling >> the exact same physical item for nearly twice the price. > > I was under the impression it was more like a ~$200 difference. I > briefly checked ebay for prices, and found ~$650-~$850 between the models. > That sounded fair to me, which made it a challenge to support my own > argument that it was the same hardware. > > Double price is another ball game altogether. They deserve what they get. I looked it up today and the MSRP for the 50Mhz model was $595 and the 100Mhz model was $795, I don't know if this price was up to date but you can buy either model on eBay with a "Buy it now" and have either model for less than the MSRP including shipping. RogerN
From: John Fields on 2 Apr 2010 16:29
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:39:21 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <aetbr5505tvnsjh7vij2h0ghdkjo1bjoot(a)4ax.com>, >jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... > >> >> Larkin, I think, is being wise by letting you stew in your own juice > >I'm mostly interested in those that hide their religion and why they do >so. --- No, you're not; you're only interested in getting attention by fostering discord. --- >I'm also curious as to what degree one will go to hide their religion. >I can't test that unless I try various strategies. --- And if they choose not to reveal their spiritual beliefs, even unto death, what will you do then? Mount your own personal inquisition? There must be a great sea of inadequacy within you which makes you so unsure of your own beliefs that you feel the need to taunt others into little traps so you can feel better about yourself. JF |