Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:26 KRW made an easter egg hunt that Larkin specified his religion in this thread. Who's smart enough to find it! -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:29 In article <l8sbr55jb9i7009ob8eg1di37f10va18do(a)4ax.com>, jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:42:00 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > wrote: > > >In article <qqhar5h75vlclgnjo91v0kjdjs28fnope4(a)4ax.com>, spam(a)spam.com > >says... > >> > >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:22:09 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> >But do you have the balls to tell me what religion Larkin is in? > >> > >> Why the obsession with what religion the man is? Did it ever occur to > >> you it's none of your business. > >> > >> Your getting pretty fucked-up. Take a couple of valium and call it a > >> night. > > > >Yup.. > >I'm just waiting for Larkin to write that his religion is none of my > >business.. > > --- > Since it should be clear to even the least intellectually gifted that > Larkin's spiritual leanings really _are_ no concern of yours, what's > left is that you're merely trolling in order to get a response from him. > > Sad, really... > > JF Yes.. It's my aim to get a response. The more difficult it is, the stronger the data point. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:31 In article <d2tbr5lnp7aondg4bkpgptm9u96g1gfj40(a)4ax.com>, jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:40:50 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > wrote: > > >In article <4llar5p9f943cv0rt0jjfn90avjo5utqb2(a)4ax.com>, > >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... > >> > >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >The bible would certainly be of interest if physics,chemisty and biology > >> >books quoted the bible on gravity theory, atomic theory and genetics. > >> > > >> >Those mid east bronze age bible writing desert monkeys didn't even know > >> >they were breathing nitrogen. > >> > >> > >> Whouda thunk that all those times I called you an idiot that it was > >> actually spot on!? > > > >Maybe you can help me out and explain what you found wrong in my post. > > --- > The Bible is certainly of interest, but it isn't a science book. > > Consequently, references to gravity theory, atomic theory and genetics > won't be found there, and your denigration of its authors as well as the > book itself is disingenuous. > > JF Thank you making the point that the bible isn't a science book.. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:39 In article <aetbr5505tvnsjh7vij2h0ghdkjo1bjoot(a)4ax.com>, jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... > > Larkin, I think, is being wise by letting you stew in your own juice I'm mostly interested in those that hide their religion and why they do so. I'm also curious as to what degree one will go to hide their religion. I can't test that unless I try various strategies. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 14:43
In article <64vbr5hut4e92q09eho894cm15conhsdat(a)4ax.com>, jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:43:05 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > wrote: > > >If you really want to make me look stupid then agree with krw that > >Larkin wrote what religion he is in. > > --- > Since _you've_ already made yourself look plenty stupid, why bother? > --- > > >And then quote the part where > >Larkin specifies what religion. > >That'll make me look more stupid than just picking on semantics or my > >bad wrighting. > > --- > Again, why bother when it's so easy watching you do it all by yourself? > > JF Can you call me stupid for being ineffective at getting Larkin to specify his religion? -- D from BC British Columbia |