Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: Archimedes' Lever on 1 Apr 2010 22:01 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: > you are >terminally ineductable on the subject, You are terminally stupid. Your horseshit has no basis in fact. You should be ignored.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 1 Apr 2010 22:09 On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:59:37 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >wrote: > >>I suspect I'm not getting all posts here. >>Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ? >>Can that be posted again. > >I'll post my position again, for your convenience: > >You are a tasteless idiot, and you suck at electronics. > >John Hear, hear! There, there...
From: John Larkin on 1 Apr 2010 22:18 On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:09:14 -0700, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:59:37 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >>wrote: >> >>>I suspect I'm not getting all posts here. >>>Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ? >>>Can that be posted again. >> >>I'll post my position again, for your convenience: >> >>You are a tasteless idiot, and you suck at electronics. >> >>John > > > Hear, hear! There, there... What? We agree on something? John
From: Archimedes' Lever on 1 Apr 2010 22:33 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >The bible would certainly be of interest if physics,chemisty and biology >books quoted the bible on gravity theory, atomic theory and genetics. > >Those mid east bronze age bible writing desert monkeys didn't even know >they were breathing nitrogen. Whouda thunk that all those times I called you an idiot that it was actually spot on!?
From: krw on 1 Apr 2010 23:08
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:22:09 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <pgbar5tad973ruhjttv83rls0ull3cmvac(a)4ax.com>, >jfields(a)austininstruments.com says... >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:41:49 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> wrote: >> >> >Wouldn't it make me look stupid if you were bluntly clear and posted 'I >> >Larkin am an atheist' or 'I Larkin am a Christian'. >> >> --- >> Well, the thing is: >> >> 1. In reality, one has nothing to do with the other. >> >> 2. You already look stupid, and, >> >> 3. Your trying to get JL to play your game of "Here are your only >> choices, choose now!" makes you look stupider yet. >> --- >> >> >Show which way I was confused. >> >> --- >> How many ways does the wind blow? >> --- >> >> >If you're a Christian, why not make it public. >> >You're in the gang, in the club, part of the group, in the herd. >> >You should easily be able to post 'I am Christian.' >> >Or post 'I am a _______ Christian.' >> >Where _____ is one of those 38000 Christian denominations. >> >It should be easy for you to post that you're Christian because the >> >majority of North America is Christian. >> >This should be as easy you writing 'I am an engineer.' >> >Are you going to let some stupid atheist make you shy in posting what >> >religion you are in. >> >> --- >> Oh, my... >> >> It seems that by being, by your own admission, a stupid atheist, you've >> never pondered the difference between being spiritual and religious or >> sorted out the difference between spirituality and religion. >> --- >> >> >Perhaps there's lots of Christians on SED that would feel all warm and >> >fuzzy inside after you post 'I Larkin am a Christian engineer.' >> >> --- >> And what would be wrong with that? >> >> Being a Christian engineer would bind him to the Old Testament as well > >But do you have the balls to tell me what religion Larkin is in? It's not his position to tell you about Larkin's beliefs when he's here to speak for himself. Because you can't read is no reason for others to speak for John. |