Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 00:07 In article <MPG.261f0a2aea8c508b989750(a)209.197.12.12>, myrealaddress(a)comic.com says... > > Krw.. it's possible I missed what Larkin wrote. Seems you're are keeping > good track of what Larkin wrote. Did he write what religion he's in? btw..Informative answers are: Yes ..He is of ______ religion. No.. He is atheist/agnostic. What's with the coverup.. It's not like I'm asking how many times he fucks his wife a week. Or perhaps that's a less sensitive question...I dunno.. You tell me. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: Archimedes' Lever on 2 Apr 2010 00:50 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:19:49 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <n2far5tb3bej3oe6bkau53ou8obck5j480(a)4ax.com>, >krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz says... >> >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >> >> >I suspect I'm not getting all posts here. >> >Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ? >> >Can that be posted again. >> >> Evidently Larking thought you would able read your own thread. However Larkin >> is overly optimistic. > >You're an excellent reader... I must have missed something.. Can you >tell me what religion Larkin is in? One doesn't get "in" a religion, you retarded twit.
From: JosephKK on 2 Apr 2010 01:22 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:58:10 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >I suspect Larkin thinks it's smart by being indirect/vague and evasive >about what religion he's in or the lack of. >It's a simple act for him to correct me and to post 'I Larkin am a >Christian' >He's yet to demonstrate free will to directly post his religion or lack >of. 'I Larkin am of the __________ religion' And maybe JL does not find any of the pigeon holes you want to stuff him into any where near large enough.
From: D from BC on 2 Apr 2010 01:43 In article <4star5ti30hhg2a8lm5ceo8qo402d4938m(a)4ax.com>, OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:19:49 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > wrote: > > >In article <n2far5tb3bej3oe6bkau53ou8obck5j480(a)4ax.com>, > >krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz says... > >> > >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I suspect I'm not getting all posts here. > >> >Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ? > >> >Can that be posted again. > >> > >> Evidently Larking thought you would able read your own thread. However Larkin > >> is overly optimistic. > > > >You're an excellent reader... I must have missed something.. Can you > >tell me what religion Larkin is in? > > One doesn't get "in" a religion, you retarded twit. If you really want to make me look stupid then agree with krw that Larkin wrote what religion he is in. And then quote the part where Larkin specifies what religion. That'll make me look more stupid than just picking on semantics or my bad wrighting. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: Jon Kirwan on 2 Apr 2010 02:20
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:35:39 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... >Time for another mega-troll. ><snip> What a megatroll it is, too. I think there are more entries here than for Dave's Rigol thread, amdx's Swing Votes thread, or your earlier BCIT EET thread. Religion may troll better than politics or electronics. I just received my "Analog Circuit Design, Art Science and Personalities" and "The Art and Science of Analog Circuit Design" books, edited by Jim Williams, in the mail a day or two, ago. To any wondering why you might write as you did, a nice article in the latter one, by R. Feynman about cargo cults, may apply. ;) Jon |