From: krw on
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:28:35 -0500, "RogerN" <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote:

>
>"D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.261e72bf2a5dc3c6989743(a)209.197.12.12...
>> In article <c1a9r5h1cmfjptvm4ccgqhvhq0c59jlpb5(a)4ax.com>,
>> jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:59:12 -0700, D from BC
>>> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <e82dnbi9zKkHYy7WnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>,
>>> >regor(a)midwest.net says...
>>> >>
>>> >> "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message
>>> >> news:MPG.261c26f5d5a8546d989733(a)209.197.12.12...
>>> >> > Roger...
>>> >> > Larkin has faith in God but wrote recently that he makes no claim
>>> >> > that
>>> >> > God exists.
>>> >> > Does he believe in God or not?
>>> >> > Is he just wishing for a God? Or is his believing in God/Jesus for a
>>> >> > ticket to heaven.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> He seemed pretty clear on it but you seem to have muddied up what he
>>> >> wrote.
>>> >
>>> >Larkin posted that there are very intelligent engineers and
>>> >mathematicians that are Christian.
>>> >This is a defense for Christianity.
>>>
>>> Your logic could equally become a defense of alcoholism. Some great
>>> electronic designers were alcoholics.
>>>
>>> >Then Larkin posts that he made no claim that God exists.
>>>
>>> Cite a post where I made a solid claim one way or the other.
>>>
>>> >He might still believe in God or have faith in God.
>>>
>>> If I did, it would trash your argument that Christians can't be good
>>> electronic designers.
>>
>> 'If I did' ... If I'm understanding your response correctly...
>> This means you have no belief in God and no faith in God.
>> Then you are atheist.
>> Larkin is an atheist.
>> Correct?
>>
>>>
>>> The only solid data point you can reference in this regard is
>>> yourself: you're not a Christian and you suck at electronics.
>>>
>>> John
>>
>> If it is incorrect that you are an atheist, then you are still dodging
>> naming your religion.
>> If it is correct you are an atheist, then imo you are deliberately not
>> effective at being clear about being an atheist.
>> An example of being clear is 'I'm an atheist'.
>> Using your attitude, I would expect you to write 'I'm an atheist you
>> idiot.'
>>
>> I dare you post what you are in the form 'I Larkin am a ____________.'
>> Fill the blank with atheist, agnostic Christian, Jewish, other...
>>
>>
>> --
>> D from BC
>> British Columbia
>
>What about agnostic? You demonstrate that you have faith that their is no
>God by taking the position of Atheist instead of agnostic. Atheism requires
>faith, believing in God requires faith, agnostic doesn't, it's that simple,
>I believe there is a God, I am absolutely positive by faith that there is no
>God (Atheism), or I don't know. Of the bunch, the Atheist is definitely the
>stupidest, and that is the group that you place yourself in.

No, the antagonistic atheist is the stupid variety. There is nothing
inherently wrong with atheism.
From: John Fields on
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:41:49 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com>
wrote:

>Wouldn't it make me look stupid if you were bluntly clear and posted 'I
>Larkin am an atheist' or 'I Larkin am a Christian'.

---
Well, the thing is:

1. In reality, one has nothing to do with the other.

2. You already look stupid, and,

3. Your trying to get JL to play your game of "Here are your only
choices, choose now!" makes you look stupider yet.
---

>Show which way I was confused.

---
How many ways does the wind blow?
---

>If you're a Christian, why not make it public.
>You're in the gang, in the club, part of the group, in the herd.
>You should easily be able to post 'I am Christian.'
>Or post 'I am a _______ Christian.'
>Where _____ is one of those 38000 Christian denominations.
>It should be easy for you to post that you're Christian because the
>majority of North America is Christian.
>This should be as easy you writing 'I am an engineer.'
>Are you going to let some stupid atheist make you shy in posting what
>religion you are in.

---
Oh, my...

It seems that by being, by your own admission, a stupid atheist, you've
never pondered the difference between being spiritual and religious or
sorted out the difference between spirituality and religion.
---

>Perhaps there's lots of Christians on SED that would feel all warm and
>fuzzy inside after you post 'I Larkin am a Christian engineer.'

---
And what would be wrong with that?

Being a Christian engineer would bind him to the Old Testament as well
as to the New, where lies are forbidden, so his machines would have to
perform as he stated they would which, as far as I know, they do.

And you, gadfly, why are you here?

JF
From: D from BC on
In article <4pcar5hrorpoti96fm89ucmuvham0sssko(a)4ax.com>,
jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says...
>
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I suspect I'm not getting all posts here.
> >Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ?
> >Can that be posted again.
>
> I'll post my position again, for your convenience:
>
> You are a tasteless idiot, and you suck at electronics.
>
> John

I got those posts.
Where's the post of
'I am of the _________ religion'?

Or maybe my reading ability is not good.
Did you write somewhere that meant
'I am of the ______ religion'?
And what was the ______. I missed that part.

This should be easily repeated.

But if you would rather not say then I'll respect that.


--
D from BC
British Columbia
From: D from BC on
In article <n2far5tb3bej3oe6bkau53ou8obck5j480(a)4ax.com>,
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz says...
>
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:33:33 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote:
>
> >I suspect I'm not getting all posts here.
> >Did Larkin write 'I am a Christian.' ?
> >Can that be posted again.
>
> Evidently Larking thought you would able read your own thread. However Larkin
> is overly optimistic.

You're an excellent reader... I must have missed something.. Can you
tell me what religion Larkin is in?



--
D from BC
British Columbia
From: Archimedes' Lever on
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:17:30 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>penchant


You have a penchant for parroting others' jackassed remarks.

You do not need to parrot anyone. You already are a jackass.