From: hhyapster on
On Jul 7, 11:35 pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
> rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
> > > >>> There is always possession ....
> > > >> And actually the one thing we do know about spirit, is that is i NOT
> > > >> limited to an earthly body, so it can move independently of it if it
> > > >> wants.
>
> > > > The spirit of a human being wants to stay in the body because that is
> > > > the best place for it until the person dies.
>
> > > Where in the body is it housed?
>
> > The entire body.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> That's adorable! A child scientist educating us atheists about spirits!
>
> Tell me, Bobby, just how many angels CAN dance on the head of a pin?

This is not correct.
Are you trying to assume that he has seen one and that he could tell
you the answer?
From: Smiler on

"Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote in message
news:6desj2F27amuU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "The Natural Philosopher" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message
> news:1215427919.25085.1(a)proxy01.news.clara.net...
>> BuddyThunder wrote:
>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>> On Jul 6, 11:04?am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
>>>>> Alex W. wrote:
>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:b9d055c5-7a5b-4534-9703-63f1e75e9648(a)56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> Your spirit is made of spirit. ?You cannot transplant it.
>>>>>> =======
>>>>>> There is always possession ....
>>>>> And actually the one thing we do know about spirit, is that is i NOT
>>>>> limited to an earthly body, so it can move independently of it if it
>>>>> wants.
>>>>>
>>>>> So yet one more lie from robbo.
>>>>
>>>> The spirit of a human being wants to stay in the body because that is
>>>> the best place for it until the person dies.
>>>
>>> Where in the body is it housed?
>>
>> In the same place a program is housed in a computer?
>
> In the hard drive?
>

Or in the floppy ;-)

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"BuddyThunder" <nospam(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:48715d87$1(a)clear.net.nz...
> rbwinn wrote:
>> On Jul 6, 11:11 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
>>> rbwinn wrote:
>>>> On Jul 6, 2:46 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e765a085-e079-4808-aa79-7244fc499d79(a)25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Jul 5, 3:53?am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:62956527-c824-415d-93ab-cdbf47127a02(a)k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> On Jul 4, 9:37 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> For the umpteenth time, we cannot tell Jesus anything.
>>>>>>>> If he existed at all, he died nearly 2,000 years ago.
>>>>>>>> Apart from an alleged brief visit shortly afterward, he hasn't been
>>>>>>>> seen
>>>>>>>> since.
>>>>>>>> How can we tell him anything, huh?
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>> Well, it is called prayer. ?Christians are commanded to pray.
>>>>>>> ====================
>>>>>>> And you're sure your prayer gets through ... even though no-one in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> history of Christian prayer has ever answered. ?You know, if I dial
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>> and get no connection, I may try a few more times, but sooner or
>>>>>>> later I
>>>>>>> realise that there's no phone at the other end ....
>>>>>> Well, mine get answered. What made you think they were not?
>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>> You're confusion in just about everything leads us to that conclusion.
>>>>> Ever had a prayer that hasn't been answered??
>>>>> No wait, I get it, you'll probably tell me it has always been
>>>>> answered, but
>>>>> not in the way you wanted.
>>>>> We hear that all of the time.
>>>>> Classic example of self-deception.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve O
>>>> Some people just cannot take no for an answer. Well, we know atheists
>>>> have an agenda.
>>> we don't.
>>>
>>> What I cannot personally understand is how atheists
>>>
>>>> expect to be able to run their agenda on God. It is just not going to
>>>> work.
>>> The exact meaning of atheism is 'without reference to (a) god'.
>>>
>>> Christians think that atheists don't believe in God. That's not true.
>>> Atheists simply don't use belief at all. God is ignored as being too
>>> loose a concept to be of practical value.
>>>
>>> Atheists do not give a toss about Christians or what they believe except
>>> when they insist of injecting their nonsense into other peoples minds.
>>>
>> You mean like atheists do with the school system?
>
> Why do you find education so objectionable?

He worships ignorance.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:6dehnlF25fvnU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> <hhyapster(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6104bae3-7547-488d-a4a3-d51e1615fb15(a)79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 5, 6:53 pm, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:62956527-c824-415d-93ab-cdbf47127a02(a)k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 4, 9:37 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > For the umpteenth time, we cannot tell Jesus anything.
>>> > If he existed at all, he died nearly 2,000 years ago.
>>> > Apart from an alleged brief visit shortly afterward, he hasn't been
>>> > seen
>>> > since.
>>> > How can we tell him anything, huh?
>>>
>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> Well, it is called prayer. Christians are commanded to pray.
>>>
>>> ====================
>>>
>>> And you're sure your prayer gets through ... even though no-one in the
>>> history of Christian prayer has ever answered. You know, if I dial a
>>> number
>>> and get no connection, I may try a few more times, but sooner or later I
>>> realise that there's no phone at the other end ....
>>
>> The real trouble is, Alex, the loon never even try to dial.
>> Worse, a lot of them dialed but no tone or connection and still think
>> the number is right.
>> They tried and tried and tried.....until the last breath, still no
>> connection.....sad.
>
> That's not the real trouble.
> They do try to dial. Again and again and again.
> And then they dial their own number and end up speaking to themselves -- a
> closed loop that will always deliver the answers already present in the
> questioner's mind. It's the perfect conversation ....
>
I would hardly describe talking to oneself as the "perfect conversation".
It's more like the perfect description of lunacy.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote in message
news:6d90ciF1e560U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
> news:03bf56d3-b444-4a0c-998b-880bcd9a17d9(a)l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 4, 9:35?am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote:
>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2efb0043-fcce-424b-9881->
>>>
>
>>>
>>> God has never commanded me to do anything at any time.
>>> I've never even met the guy.
>>> Therefore, I have never disobeyed him.
>>> As it is your belief that sin is when someone disobeys God, then I have
>>> never sinned.
>>> So does that mean I get to go to heaven?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve O
>>
>> No, atheists like you and Josef Stalin do not accept the atonement of
>> Christ for your sins.
>
> You have already claimed that I have committed no sin, because by your
> definition, sin is the wilful disobedience of God
> I have never wilfully disobeyed God because I have never once received any
> command, request or instruction from him.
> If I have never sinned, then I have no sins to atone for, therefore you
> are wrong.
>
>> Therefore you have to pay the penalty for them
>> yourself.
>
> What sins?
> How can I pay a penalty for sins I have never committed?
>
> You haven't really thought this one out, have you?
> You are either going to have to disagree that your definition of sin is
> wrong, or I have never committed a sin.
> Which one is it?
>

He appears to have run away.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279