From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:b4f48e95-5c3a-4a56-b402-3e040c8b38bd(a)34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 8:16 pm, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 5, 8:30 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 7:29?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:26:01 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> > > wrote
> > > in alt.atheism:
>
> > > >On Jul 4, 8:42?am, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > > >> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:28:00 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> > > >> wrote
> > > >> in alt.atheism:
>
> > > >> >On Jul 4, 3:03?am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> > > >> >> Alex W. wrote:
> > > >> >> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
> > > >> >> >news:9fadb87c-6364-49eb-9ca6-c8fd555f6cd3(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > >> >> > On Jul 3, 6:05?am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >> >> >>news:f807e4d0-b40f-4cb8-bb4c-12f00021898d(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > >> >> >> Well, the scriptures say that the wicked would be more
> > > >> >> >> miserable in
> > > >> >> >> the presence of God than with the devils in hell.
>
> > > >> >> >> ===========
>
> > > >> >> >> In other words, since we are all sinful by definition, the
> > > >> >> >> smart choice is
> > > >> >> >> to aim for hell in the first place. ?Nice morality ....
>
> > > >> >> > No, the smart choice is to repent of sins. ?However, atheists
> > > >> >> > claim
> > > >> >> > that nothing they do is sin, so they are not going to repent.
>
> > > >> >> Which to me indicates you have no idea what sin, or repentance,
> > > >> >> is.
>
> > > >> >> > ==========
>
> > > >> >> > Sin is a social construct. ?It exists irrespective of the
> > > >> >> > god(s) worshipped
> > > >> >> > ... or not, as the case may be.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > >> >Sin is wilful disobedience of God. ?Repentance is confessing and
> > > >> >forsaking sin.
>
> > > >> As far as we can tell, God is a human invention. God never told us
> > > >> to do
> > > >> anything. Sin, therefore, is also a human invention.- Hide quoted
> > > >> text -
>
> > > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > > >So once an atheist enters into sin, there is no turning back from
> > > >it. ? I guess that was why Josef Stalin killed 12 million people.
>
> > > God is still a human invention. Clearly the fear of God does not stop
> > > you from lying in almost every post.
>
> > > I will not respond to you for a while, you have become far too nasty
> > > in
> > > your discussions here.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I think that is wonderful.
> > Robert B. Winn
>
> Yes, Free Lunch may be feeling just as tired as I do.
> You don't have a sane mind and cannot argue logically and reasonably.-
> Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I am not arguing, hyhaps.
---------------------------------
Because you can't.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:5df4c34e-d7d8-4af8-a772-27cb446b1120(a)79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:07?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On 7 Jul 2008 00:45:54 GMT, Enkidu <fox_rgf...(a)trashmail.net> wrote in
> alt.atheism:
>
> >Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote in
> >news:09p274di91fe9iga0fioemm19lsnegpums(a)4ax.com:
>
> >>>He's dumber than Dook! How can that be?
>
> >> There is LDS equivalent to the Jesuits.
>
> >What's the conversion factor?
>
> A 'not' escaped from that sentence.
>
> Jesuits may not be able to make all Catholics think clearly (and that
> isn't exactly their goal), but they make intellectual pursuits
> honorable. LDS have BYU, not a horrible college, but still nothing to be
> confused with Georgetown or even Notre Dame.

Well, I have a high school education.
------------------------------------------
It doesn't show in your posts.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:be50429a-eefa-4f65-be84-0e1860f8cb96(a)y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 5:48?pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:06:59 +1200, BuddyThunder
> <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >rbwinn wrote:
> >> On Jul 6, 11:02?am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> >>> rbwinn wrote:
>
> >>>> My definition of sin was willful disobedience of God. ?Bearing false
> >>>> witness about me would fall under the category of willful
> >>>> disobedience
> >>>> of God.
> >>> In that case you are totally guilty of that exact sin.
>
> >>> We have already established by your own definitions that you are a
> >>> sinful person (onkl Jesus is free of sin you said) , and your lack of
> >>> charity excommnunicates you as a Christian. (you wont talk to God on
> >>> anyones behalf..)
>
> >>> I think you are in deep trouble, dude.
>
> >> No, I am fine. ?I say a little prayer every once in a while about
> >> atheists.
>
> >That one ever get answered? ;-)
>
> He didn't say what he was praying for. If you pray to God that He affect
> nothing at all, He relibly answers.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It
----------------------------------
Ho! <thwack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:64619cc6-9677-4e9a-b11a-15a111e9096b(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Jul 6, 11:02?am, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
>
> >>> My definition of sin was willful disobedience of God. ?Bearing false
> >>> witness about me would fall under the category of willful disobedience
> >>> of God.
> >> In that case you are totally guilty of that exact sin.
>
> >> We have already established by your own definitions that you are a
> >> sinful person (onkl Jesus is free of sin you said) , and your lack of
> >> charity excommnunicates you as a Christian. (you wont talk to God on
> >> anyones behalf..)
>
> >> I think you are in deep trouble, dude.
>
> > No, I am fine. I say a little prayer every once in a while about
> > atheists.
>
> That one ever get answered? ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well,
=========================
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"Linda Fox" <linda.ff(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ad3574do004i50e72i44nc6ip0418d1qhf(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:16:30 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 6, 8:35 pm, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> Why was he killed?
>
>>Bercause certain people in power wanted him dead.
>
> Oh, right. Those "people in power" means God, right, since his death
> was the fulfilment of the prophecies, since I'm sure you'll tell us
> that it was by his death that salvation was brought about?
>
> You may use both sides of the paper for your answer.
>

He'll need both sides. It's difficult to write small with crayons.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279