Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Free Lunch on 12 Jul 2008 09:11 On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:23:37 -0500, Antares 531 <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in alt.atheism: >On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:14:35 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a(a)b.c> >wrote: > >>Antares 531 wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:17:41 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a(a)b.c> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Antares 531 wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:15:08 -0700, ben_dolan_III(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) >>>>> wrote: >>> (snip) >>>>> Ben, there is an ABUNDANCE of evidence that God exists, >>>> Which God though? >>>> >>> The One whose prophecies are repeatedly and accurately fulfilled. >> >>OH, you mean a SCIENTIST. >> >>I thought we were talking religion.. >> >The Word of God is NOT in disagreement with any reliable scientific >knowledge. The confusion on this is caused by the way The Word of God >was given to humans. Then the Bible is not the Word of God. >The Word of God had to be given to us such that those primitive people >could grasp the basic meaning, and also pass the information along >from generation to generation among illiterate people, with little >drift. Allegories, parables, similes, etc., are the way this was >achieved. Tell that to the Christians today who worship the Bible. >Also, The Word of God had to be given to those early humans such that >they would have the same advantages that we have, today. That is, no >favoritism was shown by presenting the information in a form that only >a modern scientifically educated person could understand. Gordon Please point to anything in Genesis that is demonstrably correct.
From: jjmorin3 on 12 Jul 2008 09:17 She doesn't need to prove anything. Joe J0EM0 -- --------------------------------- --- -- - Posted with NewsLeecher v3.8 Final Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet ------------------- ----- ---- -- -
From: Antares 531 on 12 Jul 2008 09:30 On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:21:29 GMT, Linda Fox <linda.ff(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: >On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:33:38 +0100, "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> >wrote: >> >>rap 'music' > >both in the one sentence...does not compute... ;o) > >Linda ff > Place the word "or" between the other two.
From: Steve O on 12 Jul 2008 09:54 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:845bca25-7a13-463b-94c1-1f466a5ea605(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 11, 1:51�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> news:e730cc99-4f9a-47c2-a0e9-5a0b9903b552(a)y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > Your two year old child is trying to be like you. �Didn't you say that >> > you were an atheist? >> > Robert B. Winn >> >> What is it about the outward appearance and behaviour of an atheist which >> you imagine is noticeable or copyable for a two year old? > > I would say the fact that atheists are dishonest. My irony meter just shattered. I have rarely seen dishonesty from any atheist in this newsgroup, yet I have witnessed a constant stream of lying, deceptive and downright unpleasant theists, of which you happen to be the latest. > A two year old is learning its behavior faster at that age than at any > other time. > Robert B. Winn So you think a two year old is capable of distinguishing the difference between theism and atheism? More evidence of you delusional condition, I'm afraid to say. -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
From: rbwinn on 12 Jul 2008 10:20
On Jul 12, 6:54 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:845bca25-7a13-463b-94c1-1f466a5ea605(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jul 11, 1:51�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >>news:e730cc99-4f9a-47c2-a0e9-5a0b9903b552(a)y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > Your two year old child is trying to be like you. �Didn't you say that > >> > you were an atheist? > >> > Robert B. Winn > > >> What is it about the outward appearance and behaviour of an atheist which > >> you imagine is noticeable or copyable for a two year old? > > > I would say the fact that atheists are dishonest. > > My irony meter just shattered. > I have rarely seen dishonesty from any atheist in this newsgroup, yet I have > witnessed a constant stream of lying, deceptive and downright unpleasant > theists, of which you happen to be the latest. > > >  A two year old is learning its behavior faster at that age than at any > > other time. > > Robert B. Winn > > So you think a two year old is capable of distinguishing the difference > between theism and atheism? > More evidence of you delusional condition, I'm afraid to say. > > -- > Steve O A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. If a two year old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is going to do the same thing. Robert B. Winn |