From: gtr on
On 2010-04-05 15:11:15 -0700, Michelle Steiner said:

> In article <1jghksf.3sb0baxjhoffN%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>,
> mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote:
>
>> But they're the Los Angeles Angels. Does that constitute a miracle? (Not
>> to mention a redundancy.)
>
> Actually, they're the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.

If so, why don't we have the Brooklyn Dogers of Los Angeles and the
Baltimore Colts of Indianapolis?
--
Thank you and have a nice day.

From: gtr on
On 2010-04-05 13:45:40 -0700, Michelle Steiner said:

> In article <m24ojpbqqh.fsf(a)shermpendley.com>,
> Sherm Pendley <spamtrap(a)shermpendley.com> wrote:
>
>>> For all practical purposes, the difference here between fact and
>>> belief is moot.
>>
>> That difference is *precisely* what I'm talking about. What Ian happens
>> to believe, and whether or not I agree with it, is immaterial. I'm
>> simply arguing against the use of the word "fact" to describe something
>> that has not been proven one way or another.
>
> Ok, then, you're being a pedant.

That's true unless, to him, "pedant" means some kind of cookie.

To me "pedant" is the windshield wiper on the right side. It's a fact!
LIVE with it!
--
Thank you and have a nice day.

From: Mike Rosenberg on
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> > But they're the Los Angeles Angels. Does that constitute a miracle? (Not
> > to mention a redundancy.)
>
> Actually, they're the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim.

Yep. Makes me wonder if they're going to open franchises in other
cities, with the help of Jerry Bruckheimer.

--
My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE>

Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi>
Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Mike Rosenberg on
Nick Naym <nicknaym@_remove_this_gmail.com.invalid> wrote:

> > Meanwhile, if John would gain a fundamental understanding of the blind
> > men and the elephant, he would truly be saved. Really, truly saved. Not,
> > of course, in the metaphysical way he uses the term "saved" but in a
> > literal way, as he would save all the time and effort he wastes on
> > preaching unsubstantiated opinions. If only he were a believer...
>
> He doesn't even have a basic understanding of theology, much less any
> apparent notion of the history and anthropology of religion...

He's also apparently unaware of some of the major stories in the Bible.

> do you honestly expect him to engage in critical thinking?

No, not at all. I'm just writing for the fun of it.

--
My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE>

Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi>
Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Mike Rosenberg on
John <jwolf6589(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> > You seriously don't know what Passover is? How can you claim to know
> > anything about the Bible or Christianity without knowing about Passover?
> > Passover is central to the Easter parable!
>
> I knew what it was. I just wanted to see what he thought.

I see. "What do you mean by Passover?" is somehow supposed to convey
something other than what the words say.

--
My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE>

Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi>
Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>