From: Chris Ridd on
On 2010-07-09 13:54:04 +0100, Lynn W said:

> My thoughts and I think Apple have really dropped off on this they should
> have warned 3G owners of the problem and then we could have made the
> decision of whether to install it or not!

I can't recall Apple ever saying up front whether a particular OS
upgrade is problematic, so the sort of thing you're proposing is simply
never going to happen!

Apple never forced anyone to upgrade either. I can't remember what the
UI in iTunes was like in detail, but I think you've always been able to
opt in or out.

--
Chris

From: Howard on
Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:

> On 2010-07-09 13:54:04 +0100, Lynn W said:
>
> > My thoughts and I think Apple have really dropped off on this they should
> > have warned 3G owners of the problem and then we could have made the
> > decision of whether to install it or not!
>
> I can't recall Apple ever saying up front whether a particular OS
> upgrade is problematic, so the sort of thing you're proposing is simply
> never going to happen!
>
> Apple never forced anyone to upgrade either. I can't remember what the
> UI in iTunes was like in detail, but I think you've always been able to
> opt in or out.

You are 100% right.

But there was no indication this was any different than previous
updates. I am very IT savvy but there was also no indication that this
update would be more taxing on the processor or lead to significant
slowdowns.

It looks like very few here have downgraded...

H
From: Lynn W on
On 09/07/2010 14:25, in article 89omaeFvlhU1(a)mid.individual.net, "Chris
Ridd" <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:

> On 2010-07-09 13:54:04 +0100, Lynn W said:
>
>> My thoughts and I think Apple have really dropped off on this they should
>> have warned 3G owners of the problem and then we could have made the
>> decision of whether to install it or not!
>
> I can't recall Apple ever saying up front whether a particular OS
> upgrade is problematic, so the sort of thing you're proposing is simply
> never going to happen!
>
> Apple never forced anyone to upgrade either. I can't remember what the
> UI in iTunes was like in detail, but I think you've always been able to
> opt in or out.

If you didn't now there were problem and why would you think that Apple
would possibly produce software that would degrade the use of your iPhone
then you would automatically accept what they offered as you always have
done before. I really believe they should have posted that installing this
software would really slow up the iPhone 3Gs. I cannot afford iPhone 4 at
the moment but my iPhone now runs so slowly its driving me up the wall. For
the first time I can honestly say I am not a happy Apple customer!


Lynn
Live for today, as tomorrow is not promised


From: Lynn W on
On 09/07/2010 14:35, in article 1jld9tn.1xrwq0512szqv6N%Howard.not(a)home.com,
"Howard" <Howard.not(a)home.com> wrote:

> Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-07-09 13:54:04 +0100, Lynn W said:
>>
>>> My thoughts and I think Apple have really dropped off on this they should
>>> have warned 3G owners of the problem and then we could have made the
>>> decision of whether to install it or not!
>>
>> I can't recall Apple ever saying up front whether a particular OS
>> upgrade is problematic, so the sort of thing you're proposing is simply
>> never going to happen!
>>
>> Apple never forced anyone to upgrade either. I can't remember what the
>> UI in iTunes was like in detail, but I think you've always been able to
>> opt in or out.
>
> You are 100% right.
>
> But there was no indication this was any different than previous
> updates. I am very IT savvy but there was also no indication that this
> update would be more taxing on the processor or lead to significant
> slowdowns.
>
> It looks like very few here have downgraded...
>
> H
If I was able to restore my iPhone to it's last software I would in a flash
as its rubbish now. However it appears I need to Jailbreak it to do it,
don't want to do that . I am presuming that Jailbreaking is different to
unlocking or I can apparently ask O2 to unlock my phone now


Lynn
Live for today, as tomorrow is not promised


From: Sak Wathanasin on
On 9 July, 11:45, Howard....(a)home.com (Howard) wrote:

> On 4.0.1 this infers that there is somehting that can be fixed.. it
> seems to me that the processor in the 3G is just just not powerful
> enough to take on 4 ...

It's defnitely slower, but no where near "unusable" for me. My feeling
is that it's not raw CPU power as such, but lack of RAM that is
causing the problems with the 3G. Even if CPU is the problem, they can
speed things up in the next release (cf SL's speedups over prev OS).
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Window Blind ? any free version ?
Next: Shut Down reluctance