Is the Unix shell possible under iPhoneOS?
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: Preview cant open and display images
Next: scanning txt
From: nospam on 7 Mar 2010 19:52 In article <jollyroger-4243CA.18375707032010(a)news.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > > I love how these dumb asses make the flawed assumption that the OS > > > > > and > > > > > software running on the iPad must be exactly the same as what's > > > > > running > > > > > on iPods... > > > > > > > > for the most part, it is the same. > > > > > > FAIL. > > > > ok wiseass, how is it not the same? there are minor differences mainly > > due to screen size, but that's about it, and that's why existing iphone > > apps can run on an ipad, unmodified. > > FAIL again. You have no clue, as usual. speaking about yourself again? > Here's a quote from someone who has actually used an iPad, and therefore > describes it better than I could, or care to: nothing he said contradicts what i said. go download the sdk. as with every sdk revision, there are some new features, however, the os is basically the same and with the ipad, there fewer changes than there were from iphone os 2.0 to 3.0. > "It uses the iPhone�s basic user interface and physical design. in other words, it's the same. > But, > taking advantage of a 9.7? screen and a fast Apple-designed processor, > the iPad adds some user interface elements and functionality that aren�t > available�or at least typical�on smart phones, but look more like > computer software. adding user interface elements for the larger screen doesn't mean the os is different. rest snipped. nothing in it about the operating system.
From: nospam on 7 Mar 2010 20:02 In article <tom_stiller-BDF44A.19482407032010(a)news.individual.net>, Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > You seem to think that because a subset of the iPad's capabilities > includes those of the iPod Touch that they are identical. That's a > pretty big leap. the os is identical other than the new features in the ipad sdk, most of which will probably be in the next version of the iphone os. very little is specific to the large screen.
From: Jolly Roger on 8 Mar 2010 00:05 In article <070320101702315327%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <tom_stiller-BDF44A.19482407032010(a)news.individual.net>, Tom > Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > You seem to think that because a subset of the iPad's capabilities > > includes those of the iPod Touch that they are identical. That's a > > pretty big leap. > > the os is identical other than the new features in the ipad sdk, most > of which will probably be in the next version of the iphone os. very > little is specific to the large screen. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. But this is nothing new. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Jolly Roger on 8 Mar 2010 00:14 In article <070320101652148351%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <jollyroger-4243CA.18375707032010(a)news.individual.net>, > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I love how these dumb asses make the flawed assumption that > > > > > > the OS and software running on the iPad must be exactly the > > > > > > same as what's running on iPods... > > > > > > > > > > for the most part, it is the same. > > > > > > > > FAIL. > > > > > > ok wiseass, how is it not the same? there are minor differences mainly > > > due to screen size, but that's about it, and that's why existing iphone > > > apps can run on an ipad, unmodified. > > > > FAIL again. You have no clue, as usual. > > speaking about yourself again? > > > Here's a quote from someone who has actually used an iPad, and therefore > > describes it better than I could, or care to: > > nothing he said contradicts what i said. You said the OS and software was "for the most part, the same". Mossberg, who, unlike you, has actually used an iPad, says the software is significantly different on the iPad: "Apple has rewritten most of the core iPhone apps so they look more like, and have more of the features of, Mac or PC programs". > go download the sdk. as with every sdk revision, there are some new > features, however, the os is basically the same and with the ipad, > there fewer changes than there were from iphone os 2.0 to 3.0. > > > "It uses the iPhone�s basic user interface and physical design. > > in other words, it's the same. FAIL. Nice try at taking a single sentence from an entire article out of context in an effort to make yourself look good. Here's what he actually said: "It uses the iPhone�s basic user interface and physical design. But, taking advantage of a 9.7? screen and a fast Apple-designed processor, the iPad adds some user interface elements and functionality that aren�t available�or at least typical�on smart phones, but look more like computer software." > > But, taking advantage of a 9.7? screen and a fast Apple-designed > > processor, the iPad adds some user interface elements and > > functionality that aren�t available�or at least typical�on smart > > phones, but look more like computer software. > > adding user interface elements for the larger screen doesn't mean the > os is different. > > rest snipped. nothing in it about the operating system. My original statement wasn't exclusively about the operating system. In anticipation of you trimming it out of the quoting above to make yourself look better, I'll go ahead and repeat what I said: > > > I love how these dumb asses make the flawed assumption that > > > the OS and software running on the iPad must be exactly the > > > same as what's running on iPods... Again: The OS AND SOFTWARE running on the iPad is NOT THE SAME as what is found on iPods. You're wrong. Just admit it and move on. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: nospam on 8 Mar 2010 01:11
In article <jollyroger-8E1CB3.23053807032010(a)news.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: > > the os is identical other than the new features in the ipad sdk, most > > of which will probably be in the next version of the iphone os. very > > little is specific to the large screen. > > You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. talk is cheap. point out what's wrong. |