Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 8 Nov 2006 11:01 Ben Newsam wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> > wrote: > > >>You're amazing. You answer the first half of my sentence >>while taking it out of context by purposely ignoring the >>second half, all the while displaying your rage at having >>been caught out. > > > The only person displaying rage is you. I think you have > comprehensively insulted just about every other poster to this thread. Congratulations, you've just achieved the second level in your predicted MO.
From: unsettled on 8 Nov 2006 11:02 Ben Newsam wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> > wrote: > > >>I consider anyone anti-American who places the wants and >>needs of others, including not only foreigners in their >>own setting but also foreigners illegally in this country >>ahead of the needs of the United States and US citizens >>as a set. > > > Wow. Your attitudes sound dangerous to me. Let's hope there aren't too > many of you. Ummmm.... let me see... what's the population of the USA? > And what proportion have your views? And now what's the population of > the rest of the world? Sorry mate, you're outvoted. That's democracy > for you. Classic Brit stupidity.
From: unsettled on 8 Nov 2006 11:02 Ben Newsam wrote: > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> > wrote: > > >>You do agree we live in a great country, don't you? If you >>don't, then there's just no conversation at all to be had. > > > It would be a simply superb country if it wasn't filled with people > with shitty attitudes like yours. Classic Brit stupidity.
From: krw on 8 Nov 2006 11:13 In article <688a9$4551f8ec$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >> > >>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into > >>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. > >>> > >>>No, it's not. > >> > >>Do please supply an appropriate example. > > > > > > The computing technology has been an area where this was happening > > fast and furiously. The industry is gradually maturing so that > > will settle down. The current fast and furious industry is delivering > > information over the nets. The next one will be banking and > > trade services. > > > > The next ones? I don't know. I suspect it might involve custom-made > > items. That seems to already be getting started with car sales. > > None of which is considered heavy industry. I'd call GOOG with a $145B market cap pretty "heavy". Though I don't see why one would believe that industry and opportunities would change over time. > My point has not been successfully refuted. They have, just that you refuse to recognize your foolishness. -- Keith
From: krw on 8 Nov 2006 11:14
In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, > > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > > > >>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, > >>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > >>> > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into > >>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. > >>>> > >>>>No, it's not. > >>> > >>>Do please supply an appropriate example. > >> > >>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next > >>one will pop up. > >> > > > > > > He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, > > Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General > > Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have > > it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). > > IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than > > computer equipment :-))). > > I object because they're not heavy industry. So what? Are they not new opportunities that people have made kagillions? -- Keith |