Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 8 Nov 2006 11:31 krw wrote: > In article <e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled(a)nonsense.com says... > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >>>In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, >>> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>>> >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into >>>>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. >>>>>> >>>>>>No, it's not. >>>>> >>>>>Do please supply an appropriate example. >>>> >>>>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next >>>>one will pop up. >>>> >>> >>> >>>He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, >>>Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General >>>Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have >>>it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). >>>IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than >>>computer equipment :-))). >> >>I object because they're not heavy industry. > > > So what? Are they not new opportunities that people have made > kagillions? Let's see how smart you really are. I'll give you the elements I think important. A) To provide for the common welfare. B) In the United States, what is the distribution of socio-economic class C) Taking a high tech biz like Google, what sort of people do they employ, ie, what's the distribution
From: Ben Newsam on 8 Nov 2006 12:45 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:02:29 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ben Newsam wrote: > >> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>I consider anyone anti-American who places the wants and >>>needs of others, including not only foreigners in their >>>own setting but also foreigners illegally in this country >>>ahead of the needs of the United States and US citizens >>>as a set. >> >> >> Wow. Your attitudes sound dangerous to me. Let's hope there aren't too >> many of you. Ummmm.... let me see... what's the population of the USA? >> And what proportion have your views? And now what's the population of >> the rest of the world? Sorry mate, you're outvoted. That's democracy >> for you. > >Classic Brit stupidity. Yes. Silly of me. I should have realised that you have no real interest in democracy at all, you merely wish to impose your views on the rest of us. Actually, I knew that already, and so, it seems do many of the other posters to this thread.
From: Ben Newsam on 8 Nov 2006 12:48 On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:34:23 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >It seems unsettled only has one bogeyman to call on. If you disagree with >him you are "un-American." I disagree with him profoundly, and I'm not American at all. So I guess he's right on that one! :-)
From: lucasea on 8 Nov 2006 13:41 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:478a6$4551f826$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake wrote: > > >> >> It seems unsettled only has one bogeyman to call on. If you disagree with >> him you are "un-American." If you questions anything your government does >> you are "un-American." I am amazed he can even spell democracy. > > > I'm surprised you know the English language at all. Oh, goody, he's back in 100% insult mode. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 8 Nov 2006 13:43
"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:e81a6$4551f94f$4fe75b2$14650(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <MPG.1fb90e071de0287c989aa6(a)news.individual.net>, >> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >> >>>In article <454F423C.3B207DEE(a)hotmail.com>, >>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into >>>>>>an airframe manufacturing enterprise are gone. >>>>> >>>>>No, it's not. >>>> >>>>Do please supply an appropriate example. >>> >>>Hewlett Packard, Apple, Mc$hit, Dell... Who knows where the next one >>>will pop up. >>> >> >> >> He'll object to that because they're too old. Google, E-bay, >> Vehix(sp?). I can imagine a day where you login to General >> Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have >> it delivered in n days. I'd like to see this done with books ;-). >> IOW, mass production will become blase for anything other than >> computer equipment :-))). > > I object because they're not heavy industry. Agreed. We've evolved into a country that only knows how to invent better and better ways to serve each other hamburgers. We're now a heavily service-based economy...it's been getting worse and worse since about 1945, and what comes next can't be good. Eric Lucas |