Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Ben Newsam on 8 Nov 2006 08:30 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >I consider anyone anti-American who places the wants and >needs of others, including not only foreigners in their >own setting but also foreigners illegally in this country >ahead of the needs of the United States and US citizens >as a set. Wow. Your attitudes sound dangerous to me. Let's hope there aren't too many of you. Ummmm.... let me see... what's the population of the USA? And what proportion have your views? And now what's the population of the rest of the world? Sorry mate, you're outvoted. That's democracy for you.
From: Ben Newsam on 8 Nov 2006 08:31 On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:25:39 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >You do agree we live in a great country, don't you? If you >don't, then there's just no conversation at all to be had. It would be a simply superb country if it wasn't filled with people with shitty attitudes like yours.
From: lucasea on 8 Nov 2006 09:15 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:ac95$4551ae0f$4fe762e$13047(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > You're amazing. You answer the first half of my sentence > while taking it out of context by purposely ignoring the > second half, all the while displaying your rage at having > been caught out. No rage here. Projection? >> And here you are dead wrong in your assumptions. I love my country...so >> much so, in fact, that I want it wrested from > > the grasp of a President and political party run amok. > > You don't begin to realize how hillarous such protestations > are to someone who heard all this from members of the > communist party USA in bygone decades. Of course they > merely wanted to replace what is with something different, > something of their own choice, to the determent of the > nation as a whole. And when all other labels fail, like Joe McCarthy, you resort to the (gasp) "C-word". Get over yourself. Despite McCarthy's witch hunt idiocy, which you seem to be trying to revive, the Communist political party in this country has and had every bit as much right to exist as any other. > You've been arguing, in concert with a couple of acknowledged > Brits, not only against the interests of USA but in favor of > foreign interests. Your interpretation. I happen to believe that the things I'm arguing for are actually in the best interests of the US. Now that the majority of the US House of Representatives, and likely the US Senate, agree with me, we'll see how your attempt to smear me stands up. > Once this nation gets into a bad situation, your support > for finding a way to get past it is necessary. You're too blinded by your own hatred and arrogance to see that that is exactly what I am doing. > You do agree we live in a great country, don't you? If you > don't, then there's just no conversation at all to be had. Yes, but that doesn't mean that I have to blinder myself to its flaws. My world isn't black-and-white like yours appears to be. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 8 Nov 2006 09:16 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:5fe8e$4551b0a0$4fe762e$13092(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > > Once again, by taking my statement out of context you are able > to fly into a rage, as follows. No rage here. Projection. You really do need to do something about your rage problem. Eric Lucas
From: Eeyore on 8 Nov 2006 09:30
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >You cant have it both ways. > > Tying up the military in babysitting jobs is doing nothing useful. On the contrary. Sometimes it's very useful / effective indeed. > That seemed to be Clinton's style. I never understood it because > this approach did not work with Germany. Explain what you mean about Germany. Graham |